2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting superluminous supernovae in faint galaxies from the first year of the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
3
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distinguishing between progenitors of ∼10-20 M and greater than 50 M is not easily achieved with the data. SLSNe are rare, and occur only at a rate of about 1 in 10,000 -20,000 of the core-collapse population (Quimby et al 2011(Quimby et al , 2013McCrum et al 2015). It may be that a combination of very high mass (as traced by high sSFR) and low metallicity is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinguishing between progenitors of ∼10-20 M and greater than 50 M is not easily achieved with the data. SLSNe are rare, and occur only at a rate of about 1 in 10,000 -20,000 of the core-collapse population (Quimby et al 2011(Quimby et al , 2013McCrum et al 2015). It may be that a combination of very high mass (as traced by high sSFR) and low metallicity is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the varying coverage and quality of our light curves, we do not attempt to model the full set or make inferences about the underlying distributions of parameters assuming a magnetar model. Indeed, the objects from our sample that were previously published already have magnetar fits available in the literature (Chomiuk et al 2011;Lunnan et al 2013Lunnan et al , 2016McCrum et al 2014McCrum et al , 2015Nicholl et al 2017b). Our sample contains two previously unpublished objects, PS1-11aib and PS1-12bqf, with good coverage both on the rise and decline, however, and we explore magnetar model fits to these light curves here.…”
Section: Magnetar Fits To Ps1-11aib and Ps1-12bqfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, McCrum et al (2015) estimate that the SLSN-I rate could be up to ten times lower, based on the Pan-STARRS Medium Deep Survey over the redshift range 0.3 < z < 1.4, while Cooke et al (2012) obtain an optimistic rate of ∼ 200 yr −1…”
Section: The Observed Slsn-i Ratementioning
confidence: 99%