2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12176703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting the Optimal Green Agricultural Products Supplier: A Novel Approach Based on GBWM and PROMETHEE II

Abstract: Due to the uncertainty of natural factors and a larger global population, the work of supplying sustainable agricultural materials, especially green agricultural products, faces enormous challenges. How to effectively evaluate and select the most desirable green agricultural material supplier is an urgent issue for both agribusiness and government. In this paper, an integrated q-rung orthopair fuzzy (q-ROF) group best–worst method (GBWM) and the PROMETHEE II was introduced to availably solve such issue. Firstl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P (a, b), which denotes the preference of (a) over (b) for criterion j, wa tion of d j (a, b) by applying Equation (18). The value of P ( , b) varie widely used in the literature [69,72,73]. The choice of the usual preference function is based on the need to use an assessment model that can be easily understood by decision-makers.…”
Section: Partially Compensatory Approach: the F-promethee Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…P (a, b), which denotes the preference of (a) over (b) for criterion j, wa tion of d j (a, b) by applying Equation (18). The value of P ( , b) varie widely used in the literature [69,72,73]. The choice of the usual preference function is based on the need to use an assessment model that can be easily understood by decision-makers.…”
Section: Partially Compensatory Approach: the F-promethee Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) over (b); • P(a, b) = 1 means a strict preference of ( the application of the method more cumbersome and complex. To deal with this limitation, we used the first assumption of the strict preference function because it is the most widely used in the literature [69,72,73]. The choice of the usual preference function is based on the need to use an assessment model that can be easily understood by decision-makers.…”
Section: Partially Compensatory Approach: the F-promethee Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare our proposed methods with other MCDM methods which are not based on distance measurement, we selected three different q-ROF-based MCDM methods to validate our results. The comparative analysis is conducted with q-ROF-PROMETHEE II [64] with q = 5, which is based on outranking relations and q-ROF-EDAS [65] with q = 5, which is based on average solutions and q-ROF-TODIM [66] with q = 5, which is based on the prospect theory. The ranking results of the comparative analyses conducted by using q-ROF-based MCDM methods are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for these raw materials requires quite a large cost, because part of the company's income is used for spending on these raw materials (Safari et al, 2012). The selection of raw material suppliers must also take into account the long term (Liu et al, 2020). Supplier selection is used to identify a decision-making problem so that it is able to meet the company's needs consistently and sustainably with appropriate financing according to the company's existence (Safari et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PROMETHEE method is one of the MCDM (multi-criteria decision making) methods which is quite simple in its application (Behzadian et al, 2013). In the last few years the Promethee method has been used to solve problems in determining supplier selection (Safari et al, 2012), logistics supplier selection (Chen et al, 2010), suppliers of arocultural products (Liu et al, 2020), comparisons and industry rankings. Competency-based (Veza et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%