Selection and Neutral Mutations Drive Pervasive Mutability Losses in Long-Lived Anti-HIV B-Cell Lineages

Abstract

High-affinity antibodies arise within weeks of infection from the evolution of B-cell receptors under selection to improve antigen recognition. This rapid adaptation is enabled by the distribution of highly mutable “hotspot” motifs in B-cell receptor genes. High mutability in antigen-binding regions (complementarity determining regions [CDRs]) creates variation in binding affinity, whereas low mutability in structurally important regions (framework regions [FRs]) may reduce the frequency of destabilizing mutations. During the response, loss of mutational hotspots and changes in their distribution across CDRs and FRs are predicted to compromise the adaptability of B-cell receptors, yet the contributions of different mechanisms to gains and losses of hotspots remain unclear. We reconstructed changes in anti-HIV B-cell receptor sequences and show that mutability losses were ∼56% more frequent than gains in both CDRs and FRs, with the higher relative mutability of CDRs maintained throughout the response. At least 21% of the total mutability loss was caused by synonymous mutations. However, nonsynonymous substitutions caused most (79%) of the mutability loss in CDRs. Because CDRs also show strong positive selection, this result suggests that selection for mutations that increase binding affinity contributed to loss of mutability in antigen-binding regions. Although recurrent adaptation to evolving viruses could indirectly select for high mutation rates, we found no evidence of indirect selection to increase or retain hotspots. Our results suggest mutability losses are intrinsic to both the neutral and adaptive evolution of B-cell populations and might constrain their adaptation to rapidly evolving pathogens such as HIV and influenza.

Repertoire-wide phylogenetic models of B cell molecular evolution reveal evolutionary signatures of aging and vaccination

“…Phylogenetic techniques have been used to study B cell lineages for many years (49) and continue to be a powerful tool in understanding affinity maturation (50). Two fundamental issues that arise from the application of phylogenetic techniques to B cell repertoires are 1) the biology underlying B cell affinity maturation violates key assumptions of most phylogenetic models and 2) phylogenetic models are designed typically to work on lineages originating from a common ancestor, but B cell repertoires are composed of multiple lineages with separate ancestries, many of which are composed of only a few unique sequences.…”

Prospective Artificial Intelligence to Dissect the Dengue Immune Response and Discover Therapeutics

“…Sheng et al found specific hotspots in anti-HIV B cell receptors which are initially highly variable and lose their mutability over time (115). Vieira et al showed that this loss of mutability is caused by a 60% greater frequency of mutability losses than gains (116) and Hoehn and colleagues developed a substitution model that represents the decay of the mutation rate of B-cell lineages over time, starting from a known germline sequence (117). These studies demonstrate how the rules that shape immune repertoires are starting to be uncovered and understood.…”

Quantitative Immunology for Physicists

“…Analysis of phylogentic trees build from RepSeq data from HIV patients combined with S5F hypermutation models [240] also led to identifying the constraints on BCR adaptation [266]. Ancestral sequences in lineages are more likely to mutate their CDR3s than the framework (FWR).…”