2016
DOI: 10.4236/ojf.2016.64018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection and Screening of Superior Genotypes for Quality Planting Stock Based on Vegetative Growth Performance of Some Selected 12-Year-Old <i>Acacia</i> Species

Abstract: Production of quality wood is a big problem in forestry plantation since trees grown in plantation of some high value temperate and tropical hardwood species tend to produce low value, short butt logs and bolts due to crooked stems, low fork heights and delayed shedding of lower branches. Result from existing Acacia plantation in Malaysia indicated that most existing Acacia plantation trees especially Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangium, fork very heavily which leads to the formation of multiple leaders m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be attributed to its remarkable growth and volume, potentially explaining its exceptional performance. The current investigation is supported by prior evidence showing variation in leaf features and their correlation to production in various plant species such as Toona ciliata [33], N. cadamba [34,35], Ficus carica [36], Acacia species [7], Pongamia pinnata [37], Aquilaria malaccensis [29], Poplar [38], Dalbergia sissoo [27], and Acacia catechu [39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This could be attributed to its remarkable growth and volume, potentially explaining its exceptional performance. The current investigation is supported by prior evidence showing variation in leaf features and their correlation to production in various plant species such as Toona ciliata [33], N. cadamba [34,35], Ficus carica [36], Acacia species [7], Pongamia pinnata [37], Aquilaria malaccensis [29], Poplar [38], Dalbergia sissoo [27], and Acacia catechu [39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The progenies, specifically FCRITB03, FCRITB10, FCRITB16, and FCRITB17 displayed significantly higher measurements in various biometric characteristics including height, basal diameter, leaf length, leaf width, and leaf area. The outcomes are consistent with Neolamarckia cadamba, Casuarina clones, Ailanthus excelsa, Santalum album, Dalbergia sissoo, Pongamia pinnata, Acacia species, Salix species, Aquilaria malaccensis, Melia azedarach, Leucaena leucocephala, and Toona ciliata [7,9,11,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Furthermore, the comparable height observed in FCRITB16 and FCRITB17 can be attributed to the similarity in weather parameters, with both provincesprovinces experiencing an average temperature of 17.3 • C and annual rainfall of 2036 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Superior plus trees were selected based on their quantitative and qualitative traits, such as diameter at breast height (DBH), total height, crown emergence, crown diameter, crown form, stem straightness, branching and forking system, branching quality and quantity, the axis of branches, and pruning ability (Table 2). Detailed information on the selection criteria were obtained from Kumar et al [37]. Trees having the best phenotype for a certain growth trait were given the highest rank and followed by non-favorable phenotypes following the descending scoring system (6 for the best).…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic structures of important native timber species have been studied to identify seed transfer zones [120]. Provenance trials have been conducted for a number of plantation species, mainly Acacia and Teak [121][122][123]. The Innoprise-IKEA Tropical Forest Rehabilitation Project (INIKEA) and the Sabah Biodiversity Experiment by the University of Zurich and the University of Oxford [124] have conducted studies on the expected effects of climate change on the distributions of priority native species [125].…”
Section: Selection and Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%