1973
DOI: 10.2527/jas1973.3761289x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection for High and Low Fatness in Swine: Correlated Responses of Various Carcass Traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carcasses of obese pigs were shorter, fatter, less muscular and contained less skeletal mass (as indicated by bone trimmed from rough cuts) than carcasses of lean pigs at the termination of the study (table 4). Previous studies on obese and lean pigs indicated similar results (Davey et al, 1969;Hetzer and Miller, 1973;Davey and Bereskin, 1978;Pond et al, 1980Pond et al, , 1981. Carcass weights were similar in the two groups (table 4), even though the live weights (table 2) were different (obese < lean).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Carcasses of obese pigs were shorter, fatter, less muscular and contained less skeletal mass (as indicated by bone trimmed from rough cuts) than carcasses of lean pigs at the termination of the study (table 4). Previous studies on obese and lean pigs indicated similar results (Davey et al, 1969;Hetzer and Miller, 1973;Davey and Bereskin, 1978;Pond et al, 1980Pond et al, , 1981. Carcass weights were similar in the two groups (table 4), even though the live weights (table 2) were different (obese < lean).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Hetzer and Harvey (1967) developed obese and lean strains of swine by selection for thick or thin backfat for about 18 generations. The divergence of carcass composition in the original strains during selection was established (Hetzer and Miller, 1973), as was the compositional difference between the obese and lean pigs at young ages (Davey and Bereskin, 1977). Some nutritional requirements were studied also.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of these results is that they provide information on differences in a range of carcass characteristics which existed in groups of animals selected to represent contrasting levels of weight-adjusted ultrasonic backfat depths. Dressing-out percentage A posi ti ve relationship between fatness and dressingout percentage has been reported in several other studies with sheep (Bradford & Spurlock 1972;Kirton et al 1984) and pigs (Hetzer & Miller 1973;Chadwick 1977). The line difference in dressing-out percentage shown here paralleled breed differences reported by Wood et al (1983a) in that the group dressing out better was not only fatter but also had lighter non-carcass components.…”
Section: Selection Linesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Hetzer and Miller (1973) report differences in the direction and magnitude of correlated response in growth to changes in backfat thickness in their selection experiments with Duroc and Yorkshire pigs. They explained it by differences in genetic correlations that were positive in Duroc and negative in Yorkshire and the interaction with inbreeding in the latter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%