1991
DOI: 10.2514/3.20638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of component modes for flexible multibody simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EIM measure was developed by considering (10), from which the timedomain response of the ith fixed-interface mode to the a-set inputs can be computed as:…”
Section: Normal Modes Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EIM measure was developed by considering (10), from which the timedomain response of the ith fixed-interface mode to the a-set inputs can be computed as:…”
Section: Normal Modes Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several component mode synthesis methods have been proposed in the past [6][7][8][9], the Craig-Bampton approach being the most popular amongst the multibody dynamics community. The coordinate transformation matrix is built up in this case starting from the computation of constraint modes and fixedinterface normal modes; proper selection of the latter is a nontrivial task, and several papers exist on the subject, see, for example, [10]. In this work, the selection procedure is carried out in accordance with a modal ordering scheme based on the effective interface mass measure of dynamic importance [11,12], which ranks modes based upon their contribution to loads at component interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a more comprehensive treatment on adding constraint modes to normal modes, the textbook [15] is recommended. Indeed, the selection of a subset of component modes or assumed shape functions is an important element in substructure synthesis and the work in [17,13] is recommended for a more detail discussion.…”
Section: Substructure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages in this synergism include: (1) nominal model and uncertainties at the substructure level can be incorporated directly for control analysis and design, and (2) a class of problems involving variable stiness coupling between various structural systems can be treated conveniently. This approach allows substructure (or component mode synthesis) dynamic models (see for example [14], [15], [16], [17]) to be used directly in the analysis and design of control systems. Perhaps the major advantage in the above approach is the reduction in the dependence on on-orbit system identication testing of the assembled structure by an easier and less costly testing of substructures on the ground.…”
Section: Relation To Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea behind Song and Haug's approach is further developed and generalized by Shabana and Wehage [2,3] that use substructuring and the mode component synthesis to reduce the number of generalized co-ordinates required to represent the exible components. According to Spanos and Tsuha [4], the selection of modes required for the component mode synthesis vaguely implies the solution of an eigenvalue problem. The methodologies proposed use a limited number of modes to represent the exible components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%