2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2008.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of cytotoxicity markers for the screening of new chemical entities in a pharmaceutical context: A preliminary study using a multiplexing approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average assay window for ELEC was 60.5 and the average Z= value was 0.76, indicating that this system is adequate to be used for hit identification in a medium-throughput format (26). Eighty-five percent (101/119) of the primary hits were confirmed to be true hits by means of EC 50 determinations (Table 5), with some of them (n ϭ 19) showing efficacy at a concentration of Ͻ1 M. In parallel to the determination of antileishmanial activity, we quantified the level of cellular cytotoxicity of the hits using an established dose response assay in a human hepatocyte cell line (27,28,41) to calculate the concentration of the compound that killed 50% of the cells (CC 50 ). Taking the ratio of the cytotoxicity to the antileishmanial activity, we calculated the in vitro therapeutic index (IVTI ϭ CC 50 /EC 50 ) as an estimate of potential drug efficacy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average assay window for ELEC was 60.5 and the average Z= value was 0.76, indicating that this system is adequate to be used for hit identification in a medium-throughput format (26). Eighty-five percent (101/119) of the primary hits were confirmed to be true hits by means of EC 50 determinations (Table 5), with some of them (n ϭ 19) showing efficacy at a concentration of Ͻ1 M. In parallel to the determination of antileishmanial activity, we quantified the level of cellular cytotoxicity of the hits using an established dose response assay in a human hepatocyte cell line (27,28,41) to calculate the concentration of the compound that killed 50% of the cells (CC 50 ). Taking the ratio of the cytotoxicity to the antileishmanial activity, we calculated the in vitro therapeutic index (IVTI ϭ CC 50 /EC 50 ) as an estimate of potential drug efficacy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a cellbased assay as an alternative to animal testing to determine the toxicity of the selected compounds (27,28). The cytotoxicity was evaluated in HepG2 cells (human hepatocellular carcinoma; ATCC HB-8065) maintained in minimum essential medium (MEM) (Gibco) supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco), and 1ϫ MEM amino acid solution (Sigma).…”
Section: Assessment Of Cell Toxicity (50% Cytotoxicity Concentration mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also measured caspase-3/7 activity at 24 hr after treatment with the compounds as an index of apoptosis. Although caspase-3/7 activity has been measured after short-term treatment with compounds in some reports (Gerets et al, 2009), we employed caspase-3/7 activity after 24 hr treatment with compounds to detect apoptosis induced by mitochondrial dysfunction through various mechanisms including not only direct and rapid suppression of the mitochondrial respiration but also other mechanisms. The results of the multiple assays in this report are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that toxic effects seen in a whole organism are due to prior failure of basic cellular function, cytotoxicity studies offer a good source of information about the mechanism of toxicity (8), especially if a battery of tests is used (9,11,12,21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%