2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of hydrothermal pre-treatment conditions of waste sludge destruction using multicriteria decision-making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HTC is performed in 80-95 vol% water [17][18][19][20], making it an ideal processing pathway for wet biomasses [21,22] such as sewage sludge. As well recognized in the literature, HTC not only leads to reduced volume and energy densification of the solid residue, considerably improving its dewaterability [23,24], but also significantly increases its solid fuel properties while stabilizing and disinfecting the sludge [25,26]. Interestingly, HTC of sludge enhances NO + NH 3 reactions during solid combustion, significantly reducing NOx emissions across combustion modes [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…HTC is performed in 80-95 vol% water [17][18][19][20], making it an ideal processing pathway for wet biomasses [21,22] such as sewage sludge. As well recognized in the literature, HTC not only leads to reduced volume and energy densification of the solid residue, considerably improving its dewaterability [23,24], but also significantly increases its solid fuel properties while stabilizing and disinfecting the sludge [25,26]. Interestingly, HTC of sludge enhances NO + NH 3 reactions during solid combustion, significantly reducing NOx emissions across combustion modes [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…First, total aggregation, where a global score based is computed, methods such as MAUT -Multi-Utility Attribute Theory [25] used by Ma et al [31] and Oberschmidt et al [32] or AHPAnalytic Hierarchical Process [28] used by Van Dael et al [29], Kangas and Kangas [30], and Ma et al [31]. The second family of methods named partial aggregation (outranking) which are based on pairwise comparison, such as ELECTRE or PROMETHEE used by Oberschmidt et al [32], Al-Shiekh Khalil et al [33], Vego et al [34]. Although use of these methods is growing, future research should aim to address these issues in a more complete way to create a basis for implementing best practices in bioenergy projects.…”
Section: Multicriteria Analysis (Mca) For Bioenergy Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%