2012
DOI: 10.1108/17410381211267727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of logistic service provider using fuzzy PROMETHEE for a cement industry

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to develop a method to select the best alternative in a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) environment when the decision is taken by a group of members in an uncertain environment. Design/methodology/approach -In this paper, Fuzzy Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (Fuzzy PROMETHEE) technique has been used for MCDM problems. The team of decision makers is constituted to integrate their opinion. The analysis is done using Geometrical Analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Yılmaz and Dağdeviren () selected MIG/MAG welding machines with F‐PROMETHEE and 0–1 goal programming methodologies. Gupta, Sachdeva, and Bhardwaj () selected logistic service providers for a cement company, where Jihen, El Mhamedi, and Chabchoub () selected the best reverse logistics provider. Mateo () described how to employ the F‐RPOMETHEE method step by step.…”
Section: Principles Of Ahp and Fuzzy Promethee Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yılmaz and Dağdeviren () selected MIG/MAG welding machines with F‐PROMETHEE and 0–1 goal programming methodologies. Gupta, Sachdeva, and Bhardwaj () selected logistic service providers for a cement company, where Jihen, El Mhamedi, and Chabchoub () selected the best reverse logistics provider. Mateo () described how to employ the F‐RPOMETHEE method step by step.…”
Section: Principles Of Ahp and Fuzzy Promethee Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision-making method ( Selection of logistic service provider using fuzzy PROMETHEE for a cement industry (Gupta et al 2012) Prove the significance of each criterion and define it on the scale of an interval. PROMETHEE with Precedence Order in the Criteria (PPOC) as a New Group Decision-making Aid: An Application in Urban Water Supply Management (Roozbahani et al 2012) Expert judgment method Complex estimation and choice of resource saving decisions in construction (Zavadskas 1987) In determining the significance of quantitative indicators, the order of priority was arranged Multiple criteria evaluation of buildings (Zavadskas, Kaklauskas 1996) Risk assessment of construction projects Multiple criteria evaluation of buildings (Zavadskas, Kaklauskas 1996) Optimal alternative is the minimum distance from ideal solution and maximum distance from ideal solution is the worst COPRAS based comparative analysis of the European country management capabilities within the construction sector in the time of crisis (Kildienė et al 2011) Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods (Chatterjee et al 2011) Material selection using preferential ranking methods (Chatterjee, Chakraborty 2012) Evaluating the construction methods of cold-formed steel structures in reconstructing the areas damaged in natural crises, using the methods AHP and COPRAS-G (Bitarafan et al 2012) Owner preferences regarding renovation measures Á the demonstration of using multi-criteria decision-making (Medineckienė, Bjö rk 2011) Multiple criteria decision support system for assessment of projects managers in construction ) COPRAS-G Risk assessment of construction projects The optimal alternative is at the minimum distance from the ideal solution while the maximum distance from the ideal solution means the worst option.…”
Section: Copras (Complex Proportional Assessment Of Alternatives)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green logistics is characterized by the level of pollutant emissions or the pollutants released, energy consumption [58], the use of clean materials and energy as well as environmental expenditures [35,36,78].…”
Section: Environmental Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%