1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf00032082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection response under random mating and under selfing in the progeny of a cross of homozygous parents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most theoretical research suggests that random mating for more than a single generation provides little benefit for the time and resources required (Pederson 1974;Bos 1977;Stam 1977). emphasized that in addition to enhancing genetic variation, random mating may have the undesirable effect of disrupting linkage blocks which maintain favorable epistatic interactions.…”
Section: Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most theoretical research suggests that random mating for more than a single generation provides little benefit for the time and resources required (Pederson 1974;Bos 1977;Stam 1977). emphasized that in addition to enhancing genetic variation, random mating may have the undesirable effect of disrupting linkage blocks which maintain favorable epistatic interactions.…”
Section: Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the significance of intensive (spontaneous) mating in the F 2 and the F 3 for recombination is negligeable (Bos, 1977 ;STAM, 1977) . We can but conclude that male sterility will be of little use when intermating varieties of self-fertilizing crops .…”
Section: Could Male Sterility Be a Help?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pedigree breeding is the most commonly used method for developing improved cultivars in dolichos bean (Ramesh and Byregowda, 2016), as is practiced in other legumes and inbreeding species. However, pedigree method of breeding enable exploiting only fixable genetic effects as a result of rapid increase in homozygosis (Clegg et al, 1972), which further limits opportunities for recombination retaining and/or favoring accumulation of haplotypes harboring genes controlling desirable and undesirable traits (Hanson, 1959;Pederson, 1974;Bos, 1977;Stam, 1977). One or a few cycles of inter-mating in F 2 generation results in break-up of linkage blocks and help create populations with high frequency of desired recombinants which otherwise cannot be realized in later generations (Hanson, 1959;Bos, 1977;Stam, 1977;Yunus and Paroda, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%