2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2003.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective and rapid liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the determination of lercanidipine in human plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reported that analytes of the lercanidipine, benazepril and benazeprilat were identified by HPLC [9][10][11][12]2,13,14], derivative spectrophotometry [15][16][17][18][19], capillary electrophoresis (CE) [20], high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) [21], gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [22] and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [1,20,23]. Few methods are reported for the assay of combination drug products containing two or more active drug substances [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that analytes of the lercanidipine, benazepril and benazeprilat were identified by HPLC [9][10][11][12]2,13,14], derivative spectrophotometry [15][16][17][18][19], capillary electrophoresis (CE) [20], high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) [21], gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [22] and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [1,20,23]. Few methods are reported for the assay of combination drug products containing two or more active drug substances [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing tG often increases the overall resolution of complex samples. For efficient gradient optimization the use of software simulation programs is very useful, since the predictions on the effects of gradient factors are not always intuitive [16].…”
Section: Phase 2-methods Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a couple of commonly used ways of measuring matrix effects. One approach is to compare the MS response of the analyte spiked postextraction with that in a neat solution [124][125][126][127][128][129]. Since there is no extraction involved, any signal loss or enhancement in the post-extraction spiked sample will be assumed due to matrix effects.…”
Section: Matrix Effects and Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%