2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective CB2 receptor agonists. Part 2: Structure–activity relationship studies and optimization of proline-based compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…129,130 Proline analogs 116 and 117, developed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, are two of the most selective compounds reported to date with greater than 35,700-fold selectivity and 29,300fold selectivity, respectively. 131 Both of these demonstrated a dose-dependent reversal of hyperalgesia in a rat diabetic neuropathy model. outlook.…”
Section: Synthetic Classical Cannabinoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…129,130 Proline analogs 116 and 117, developed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, are two of the most selective compounds reported to date with greater than 35,700-fold selectivity and 29,300fold selectivity, respectively. 131 Both of these demonstrated a dose-dependent reversal of hyperalgesia in a rat diabetic neuropathy model. outlook.…”
Section: Synthetic Classical Cannabinoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several proline derivatives were identified by a computer assisted drug design (CADD) approach based on a well-known series of CB2 receptor ligands by Hickey and co-workers [ 102 ]. Several ( S )-isomers showed full CB2 agonist activities with high potencies (picomolar range) and a CB2/CB1 selectivity ratio higher than 750, while the corresponding ( R )-isomers displayed a partial agonist profile with lower potencies toward the CB2 receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4H), 1.41 (H8, H9, 3b, m, 4H), 1.39 (H6, 3a, 3b, m, 2H), 0.96 (CH 3 , t-Bu, 3a, s, 9H), 0.92 (CH 3 , t-Bu, 3b, s, 9H). 13 C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ/ppm 176.1 (CO, 3a), 175.6 (CO, 3b), 172.8 (CO, 3a), 172.6 (CO, 3b), 166.6 (CO, 3a), 165.9 (CO, 3b), 147.9 (Car, 3a), 147.8 (Car, 3b), 142.8 (Car, 3a), 141.1 (Car, 3b), 130.8, 129.2, 123.8, 123.6 (CHar, 3a, 3b), 59.9 (C1, 3a), 59.4 (C1, 3b), 58.8 (C2, 3a), 58.7 (C2, 3b), 56.0 (C6, 3a), 55.9 (C6, 3b), 52.5 (OMe, 3a), 52.2 (OMe, 3b), 52.2 (C5, 3a), 51.9 (C5, 3b), 31.6 (C7, 3a), 31.6 (C7, 3b), 31.6, 31.5, 31.4, 31.4, 30.9, 30.9 (CH 3 , t-Bu, 3a, 3b), 29.2 (C4, 3a), 29.1 (C4, 3b), 28.8, 28.6, 28.5, 28.4 (C8, C9, 3a, 3b), 24.6 (C3, 3a), 24.2 (C3, 3b…”
Section: ■ Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyclization can also be performed by intramolecular N -alkylation of an amide or by C–C bond formation . In addition to these cyclization strategies, several (3 + 2) and (4 + 1) cycloaddition/annulation reactions leading to the γ-lactam structure have also been designed …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation