2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Changes in the Immune Profile of Tumor-Draining Lymph Nodes After Different Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Regimens for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a beneficial role for (chemo)radiation in host immune response to HPVOPC would be consistent with recent clinical literature describing immune-stimulating effects of chemotherapy and radiation in melanoma (25,26) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (27). However, the results of clinical studies in HPV+ cervical and oropharyngeal cancers have been mixed, with some studies showing evidence of post-treatment immune activation (28,29) and others immune suppression (3032). It is possible that different treatment regimens may have differing effects on anti-tumor immunity, as has been shown in at least one study which found an immune-enhancing effect in the draining nodes after low-dose XRT but an immunosuppressive effect of high-dose XRT (50 Gy – consistent with standard-of-care clinical practice (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a beneficial role for (chemo)radiation in host immune response to HPVOPC would be consistent with recent clinical literature describing immune-stimulating effects of chemotherapy and radiation in melanoma (25,26) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (27). However, the results of clinical studies in HPV+ cervical and oropharyngeal cancers have been mixed, with some studies showing evidence of post-treatment immune activation (28,29) and others immune suppression (3032). It is possible that different treatment regimens may have differing effects on anti-tumor immunity, as has been shown in at least one study which found an immune-enhancing effect in the draining nodes after low-dose XRT but an immunosuppressive effect of high-dose XRT (50 Gy – consistent with standard-of-care clinical practice (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of clinical studies in HPV+ cervical and oropharyngeal cancers have been mixed, with some studies showing evidence of post-treatment immune activation (28,29) and others immune suppression (3032). It is possible that different treatment regimens may have differing effects on anti-tumor immunity, as has been shown in at least one study which found an immune-enhancing effect in the draining nodes after low-dose XRT but an immunosuppressive effect of high-dose XRT (50 Gy – consistent with standard-of-care clinical practice (32). However, an important difference between in vivo mouse models of radiation and XRT for head and neck cancer patients is that most of the existing mouse models employ relatively few fractions of radiation, whereas head and neck cancer patients are treated in many small fractions over the course of weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-institute study in France showed that sensitivity to chemotherapy was reduced in cervical cancer patients with menopause, parametrial invasion, LVSI, or cervical mucous cancer[25] Molecular factors found to be associated with NACT resistance include clusterin[26], an anti-apoptotic molecule, and excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1)[27]. In addition, Battaglia et al [28] suggested that NACT supplemented by small dose of radiotherapy could change the immune status of the lymph nodes and then increase the efficacy of chemotherapy. In this study, all but 1 patient with stage IIb cervical cancer underwent NACT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Battaglia et al [28]. found that NACT, especially when supplemented with radiotherapy, can effectively improve anti-tumor immune responses of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical cancer patients and thus reduce lymph node metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, cyclophosphamide used as a single agent was shown to inhibit the Treg compartment, while the effector compartment was not negatively influenced [161,162]. In cervical cancer patients Treg numbers were decreased after preoperative low-dose chemoradiation therapy [127,163]. Combinational therapy has not been studied in cervical cancer patients, but may prove to be an effective approach to enhance anti-tumor vaccination strategies.…”
Section: Depletion Of Tregs Based On Cytotoxic Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%