1969
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2364(69)90065-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective determination of relaxation times in high resolution NMR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
10

Year Published

1970
1970
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
34
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The two couplings were then increased in magnitude until the undecoupled observed spectra matched the calculated spectra as closely as possible. Considering the uncertainties (f 0.5 s) in the assumed T2 values, the fact that the peaks need not have the same natural line-widths (14,15) and the inherent uncertainties in intensity measurements, it was concluded that 4~p H , N H 2 and 6 J, H , N H~ remained uncertain to within 0.03 Hz.…”
Section: Results and Discussion ( I ) Analyses Of Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two couplings were then increased in magnitude until the undecoupled observed spectra matched the calculated spectra as closely as possible. Considering the uncertainties (f 0.5 s) in the assumed T2 values, the fact that the peaks need not have the same natural line-widths (14,15) and the inherent uncertainties in intensity measurements, it was concluded that 4~p H , N H 2 and 6 J, H , N H~ remained uncertain to within 0.03 Hz.…”
Section: Results and Discussion ( I ) Analyses Of Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a mainly unperturbed situation, the proton H 1 could produce a relevant NOE on the proton These may also be detected by the determination of the cross-relaxation parameters σ ij for the proton pairs H 1 ϪH 4 and H 1 ϪH 2 . In the initial rate approximation, [15] these relaxation parameters describe the magnetization transfer between the spins i and j and depend on the internuclear distances r ij and on the rotational correlation times τ c of the vector ij, as described in Equation 2. (2) where γ is the proton magnetogyric ratio, ω 0 is the proton Larmor frequency and is the reduced Planck constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were zero-filled to 2 K ϫ 1 K and a Gaussian function was applied for processing in both dimensions. The selective relaxation rates were measured in the initialrate approximation [15] by employing a selective π pulse with the proton decoupler at the selected frequency for 25 ms. After the delay τ, a non-selective π/2 pulse was employed to detect the longitudinal magnetization. For the biselective measurements, the two protons were inverted consecutively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal pulse sequence in this case reduces to selectively inverting I z S ␤ to ϪI z S ␤ by weak rf irradiation at the frequency (ϪJ͞2) of the slowly relaxing multiplet component. Such selective inversions have been performed in the past for various applications, including the selective measurement of relaxation rates (11,(20)(21)(22)(23). Because the component I z S ␣ , which we do not want to invert, has a large transverse relaxation rate given by k a ϩ k c , it is possible to carry out the selective inversion process Selective population inversion of the energy levels ␣␤ and ␤␤, corresponding to a transfer of polarization I z (A) to longitudinal two-spin order 2I zSz (B).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%