2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-015-1099-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Embolisation of a Heavily Bleeding Cervical Fibroid in a Pregnant Woman

Abstract: We report a case of a 20-week pregnant woman, who underwent embolisation of a cervical fibroid to end a life-threatening massive bleeding. This is the first reported case in the literature of a super-selective uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE) in a pregnant woman, even though pregnancy is considered an absolute contraindication for UFE. This rare case demonstrates that UFE can be safely performed during pregnancy providing an excellent short- and long-term clinical outcome for both mother and child.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These women may benefit from super-selective embolization of the leiomyoma or cervicovaginal artery; however, subsequent pregnancies after uterine embolization have a statistically significantly higher rate of spontaneous abortion (56% vs. 10.5%), malpresentation (20%), and cesarean section (80%) compared to those following surgical uterine artery occlusion [84]. In the study of Ferrari et al, IRT procedures were successful in 10/18 (55.5%) cases and in the two cases undergoing super-selective cervico-vaginal artery embolization and UFE (pregnant patient), respectively [7,80]. The largest treated tumor was of 9 cm in maximum size [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These women may benefit from super-selective embolization of the leiomyoma or cervicovaginal artery; however, subsequent pregnancies after uterine embolization have a statistically significantly higher rate of spontaneous abortion (56% vs. 10.5%), malpresentation (20%), and cesarean section (80%) compared to those following surgical uterine artery occlusion [84]. In the study of Ferrari et al, IRT procedures were successful in 10/18 (55.5%) cases and in the two cases undergoing super-selective cervico-vaginal artery embolization and UFE (pregnant patient), respectively [7,80]. The largest treated tumor was of 9 cm in maximum size [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only three (13%) patients with CL were treated with surgery (2 vaginal myomectomy at 15 and 36 weeks of gestation, respectively) or IRT (1 super-selective uterine fibroid embolization) during pregnancy [7,64,80,81]. No relevant complications were reported in these cases, but prolapse and/or premature rupture of membranes with chorioamnionitis and fetal loss could sometimes happen [64,75,78,82,83].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are aware of two reports [ 24 , 27 ] on UAE in the treatment of cervical leiomyomata. The first report compared effectiveness of UAE of cervical leiomyomata versus uterine fundal/body leiomyomata with imaging and stated that “the results of UAE were disappointing, indicating a need for caution in selecting and counseling patients for this treatment” [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second publication concerns the world’s first reported UAE during pregnancy [ 27 ]. We hypothesized that the pregnancy itself would be an influencing factor on the cervical leiomyomata growth, which is why we excluded pregnant or postpartum patients in this study [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%