2003
DOI: 10.1002/xrs.641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective excitation and integral counting of x‐ray fluorescence (SEICXRF)

Abstract: INTRODUCTIONThe conventional x-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer is based on the ionization of the atoms present in the sample using, as excitation source, either photons with several discrete energies (from radioisotope sources) or with an energy spectral distribution (from an x-ray tube or synchrotron radiation). An alternative XRF method is presented here. In this case, the atoms of the elements present in the sample are selectively excited using, for that purpose, a beam of monochromatic radiation whose … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The entire emitted XRF signal was collected in a large solid angle, very low-resolution detector, such as a scintillation or hemispherical gas proportional counter. In the first paper of the series, Figueroa 46 described the experimental configuration, typical data and their treatment. Considering the high power and complexity of this system, the detection limits of 10, 6 and 38 mg g À1 for Fe, Mn and Ti, respectively, were less than exciting and were quoted with no measurement time so that any comparison to existing XRF approaches is difficult and the claim of the author for higher count rates and simpler spectra than EDXRF was not reflected in the quoted performance.…”
Section: Matrix Correction and Calibration Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire emitted XRF signal was collected in a large solid angle, very low-resolution detector, such as a scintillation or hemispherical gas proportional counter. In the first paper of the series, Figueroa 46 described the experimental configuration, typical data and their treatment. Considering the high power and complexity of this system, the detection limits of 10, 6 and 38 mg g À1 for Fe, Mn and Ti, respectively, were less than exciting and were quoted with no measurement time so that any comparison to existing XRF approaches is difficult and the claim of the author for higher count rates and simpler spectra than EDXRF was not reflected in the quoted performance.…”
Section: Matrix Correction and Calibration Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%