2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32239-7_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Feature Aggregation Network with Area-Boundary Constraints for Polyp Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
112
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
112
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous study similar to ours is the selective feature‐aggregation network with area‐boundary constraints for polyp segmentation developed by Fang et al 36 . The main difference in this study is that we use the dynamic task‐balancing strategy to improve the efficiency of multitask learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previous study similar to ours is the selective feature‐aggregation network with area‐boundary constraints for polyp segmentation developed by Fang et al 36 . The main difference in this study is that we use the dynamic task‐balancing strategy to improve the efficiency of multitask learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our goal was to minimize the weighted sum of training losses of all tasks as.italicminnormalΘfalse∑i=1mwi0.166667emL)(Di;normalΘwhere wi was the weight of the ith task. For the segmentation task, the optimization objective was to minimize the dice loss function LDice 32 and categorical cross‐entropy loss LCE 36 asLD1;Θ=LitalicDice+LitalicCE…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This map is then refined by a series of recurrent reverse attention layers. Fang et al [17] used a network with one encoder and two mutually constrained decoders, one for predicting areas and another for predicting boundaries. The network then aggregates the features.…”
Section: ) Biomedical Image Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, only the methods published in the last two years, which clearly describe the experimental arrangement for selection of the training and test data subsets, have been listed. Interested readers can find more about other recently proposed methods in [60][61][62]. The information about other related colonoscopy image analysis problems, use of handcrafted features, and use of different modalities can be found in [9,24,27,63,64].…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%