2017
DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2018.1410978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Intervention in Dispute Resolution: Local Government and Community Governance in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dependent variables 38 Gallagher et al 2014. 39 Hu, Tu andWu 2017;Wright 2018. 40 Gallagher 2006Su and He 2010. are the three different modes of government responses (non-intervention, nonforceful intervention and forceful intervention) and the independent variables are dummies of the top seven demands found in each of the collective actions in the sample.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependent variables 38 Gallagher et al 2014. 39 Hu, Tu andWu 2017;Wright 2018. 40 Gallagher 2006Su and He 2010. are the three different modes of government responses (non-intervention, nonforceful intervention and forceful intervention) and the independent variables are dummies of the top seven demands found in each of the collective actions in the sample.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that close social relationships among residents can lead to conflicts of opinion when there is a lack of government leadership and management. Hu, Yue, and Tong (2018) proposed three examples to illustrate the effects of different levels of government intervention on residents' collective behavior. Hu et al (2018) also concluded that when the level of cohesion among residents is high, resident self-governance is more likely to pose risks to residents' collective behavior.…”
Section: Adding Flowers To Brocade: When Residents Have a Strong Will...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is perhaps for this reason that additional, and often redundant, channels were established to enable citizens to monitor public officials. Village elections (O'Brien and Li, 2000), the media (Stockmann, 2013), civil society organisations (Li et al, 2018;Teets, 2013), public deliberation arenas (He and Warren, 2011), local informants (Guo, 2012;Lucas and Feng, 2018), administrative litigation (Michelson, 2007;O'Brien and Li, 2004;Woo, 2011), and "grid management" (Chen and Kang, 2016;Hu et al, 2018) all helped (local) leaders to gather citizen feedback on government performance. Popular protest represents another source of valuable information on public discontent and is therefore occasionally tolerated by central and local leaders (Cai, 2008;Lorentzen, 2017).…”
Section: Citizen Feedback In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%