2018 3rd International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icsrs.2018.8688871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Maintenance Modeling for a Multi-State System Considering Human Reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some were based on the risk probability assessment, such as Reference [22], which proposed a risk model for the definition of the function of reliability (or failure) of "human component" in a railway system and Reference [26], which presented a risk-based methodology to estimate shutdown inspection and the maintenance interval by integrating human errors with degradation modelling of a processing unit. Some of the papers [17,19,28,34] adopted the HRA methods, analysed maintenance error, and measured the occurrence of human error during maintenance tasks. For example, Reference [17] presents a conceptual modelling of human error, defined the system failure, listed and analysed the related human operation, estimated the error probabilities and the effects of human errors on the system.…”
Section: Topic 1 and Topic 2: Human Error And Human Reliability In In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some were based on the risk probability assessment, such as Reference [22], which proposed a risk model for the definition of the function of reliability (or failure) of "human component" in a railway system and Reference [26], which presented a risk-based methodology to estimate shutdown inspection and the maintenance interval by integrating human errors with degradation modelling of a processing unit. Some of the papers [17,19,28,34] adopted the HRA methods, analysed maintenance error, and measured the occurrence of human error during maintenance tasks. For example, Reference [17] presents a conceptual modelling of human error, defined the system failure, listed and analysed the related human operation, estimated the error probabilities and the effects of human errors on the system.…”
Section: Topic 1 and Topic 2: Human Error And Human Reliability In In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the composition function is given by: 20 , 0.2392v 0 + 0.3108v 10 + 0.45v 20 = 0.3566v 0 + 0.4004v 10 + 0.243v 20 (24) If the performance rate requirement of the MSS at the end of the next mission is 10, the reliability of the MSS to perform the next mission is 0.6434.…”
Section: Estimation Of Component State Degradation and Multi-state Symentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that as the HEP decreases, there is a higher probability that the component will be in a higher state. If we use the selective maintenance model proposed in [24], the probability of components in different states after maintenance is equal for all workers, i.e., P n m (Z i = B i ) = 0.2, which is unable to reflect the different levels of workers. Table 1 shows the probability ranking of component i in each level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shahraki et al 14 studied selective maintenance optimization for multi-state systems with stochastically dependent components and stochastic imperfect maintenance actions. Of course, some scholars have done some other studies on multi-state selective maintenance problems, [23][24][25][26] which will not be introduced in detail here. However, the above research on multi-state selective maintenance still has the following problems:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%