2016
DOI: 10.1126/science.aag1420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective modulation of cortical state during spatial attention

Abstract: Neocortical activity is permeated with endogenously generated fluctuations, but how these dynamics affect goal-directed behavior remains a mystery. We found that ensemble neural activity in primate visual cortex spontaneously fluctuated between phases of vigorous (On) and faint (Off) spiking synchronously across cortical layers. These On-Off dynamics, reflecting global changes in cortical state, were also modulated at a local scale during selective attention. Moreover, the momentary phase of local ensemble act… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

29
276
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
29
276
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, these gain fluctuations are well approximated by a one-dimensional, global stochastic process affecting all neurons in the population (Ecker et al, 2014; Rabinowitz et al, 2015; Lin et al, 2015; Ecker et al, 2016; Engel et al, 2016; Whiteway and Butts, 2017). When these techniques are applied to population recordings subject to attentional modulation, the global gain fluctuations are considerably reduced in the attended state (Rabinowitz et al, 2015; Ecker et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, these gain fluctuations are well approximated by a one-dimensional, global stochastic process affecting all neurons in the population (Ecker et al, 2014; Rabinowitz et al, 2015; Lin et al, 2015; Ecker et al, 2016; Engel et al, 2016; Whiteway and Butts, 2017). When these techniques are applied to population recordings subject to attentional modulation, the global gain fluctuations are considerably reduced in the attended state (Rabinowitz et al, 2015; Ecker et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years there has been increased focus on how brain states affect trial-to-trial spiking variability (Crochet et al, 2011; Lin et al, 2015; Doiron et al, 2016; Stringer et al, 2016). In particular, attention decreases the shared variability (noise correlations) of the firing rates from pairs of neurons (Cohen and Maunsell, 2009; Mitchell et al, 2009; Cohen and Maunsell, 2011; Herrero et al, 2013; Ruff and Cohen, 2014; Engel et al, 2016). The combination of a reduction in noise correlations and an increase in response gain has potentially important functional consequences through an improved population code (Cohen and Maunsell, 2009; Rabinowitz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spatial location or target in a mixture), like many visual studies (e.g. [51]), and one olfactory study (see [52]). Second, while an odor on/off design would have matched the tone on/off structure, it would have resulted in half the number of trials and cell-odor pairs to analyze.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In primates performing visual tasks, selective attention strongly modulates cortical state (Engel et al, 2016) and population correlations (Kohn et al, 2016;Nienborg et al, 2012). Reduction of correlated activity (decorrelation) best accounts for perceptual improvements in these tasks (Cohen and Maunsell, 2009), but the neuronal subtypes involved remain unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%