2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective rather than universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of hypertension in subjects with GDM differed from the control group, being higher (14.9% vs 4.8%, respectively, P = 0.007). GDM group also had a higher family history of DM (approximately 70%) when compared with Euro-descendant healthy pregnant women from Portugal (16%) (27) and France (19%) (28). The median (control vs GDM) of fasting glucose and 2-h, 75g glucose, 84 (79-88) vs 88 (81-95) mg/dL and 86.2 (79-102) vs 161.0 (149-176) mg/dL, showed higher concentration in GDM group (P < 0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of hypertension in subjects with GDM differed from the control group, being higher (14.9% vs 4.8%, respectively, P = 0.007). GDM group also had a higher family history of DM (approximately 70%) when compared with Euro-descendant healthy pregnant women from Portugal (16%) (27) and France (19%) (28). The median (control vs GDM) of fasting glucose and 2-h, 75g glucose, 84 (79-88) vs 88 (81-95) mg/dL and 86.2 (79-102) vs 161.0 (149-176) mg/dL, showed higher concentration in GDM group (P < 0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Denmark, selective screening for diabetes in pregnant women is performed with an oral glucose tolerance test in case of glycosuria or if the woman has other known risk factors . Such selective screening approach will, however, not identify all cases of diabetes in pregnancy . The high risk of pregnancy loss in women with diabetes observed in the present study adds to the hypothesis that insufficiently treated or undetected and untreated maternal endocrine disease was an underlying mechanism in the increased risk of pregnancy loss in diabetes as well as in hypo‐ and hyperthyroidism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…GDM patients were older (median age 32 vs 30 years) and heavier (BMI 32.6 vs 26.1 kg/m 2 ) compared with healthy pregnant controls. A history of family diabetes was high in the GDM group (66.7%) when compared to other Euro-descendent healthy pregnant women from Portugal (16%) (Ribeiro et al, 2015) and France (16%) (Miailhe et al, 2015). This information for the control group was not available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%