2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-014-3688-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective separation of uranium(VI) from aqueous solutions using amine functionalized cellulose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, various techniques have been applied for recovery and removal of uranium from its leach liquors or effluents such as precipitation (Mellah, Chegrouche, & Barkat, 2007;Zhang, Dodge, Malhotra, & Francis, 2013), co-precipitation (Aydin & Soylak, 2007;Reeder et al, 2001), solvent extraction (Agrawl, Shrivatav, & Mnom, 2000;Quinn, Wilkins, & Soldenhoff, 2013;Zhu, Pranolo, & Cheng, 2016), chromatographic extraction (Dietz, Philip, Sajdak, & Chiarizia, 2001;Prasada, Metilde, & Gladis, 2006), ion exchange (Gu, Ku, & Brown, 2005;Pulhani, Dafauti, & Hegde, 2012;Solgy, Taghizadeh, & Ghoddocynejad, 2015), membrane dialysis (Kedari, Pandit, & Gandhi, 2013;Bockris, 1972), solid phase extraction (Barbette et al, 2004;Keshtkar, Irani, & Moosavian, 2013;Song et al, 2012;Yousif, El-Afandy, Abdel-Wahab, Mubark, & Ibrahim, 2015;Zou & Zhao, 2012), ultrafiltration (Drozdzaka et al, 2016), nanofiltration (Shena & Sch€ aferb, 2014), resin-in-pulp (Sreenivas & Rajan, 2013), biosorption (Saini & Melo, 2015) and electrodeposition (Ko, Lim, Choi, Chung, & Kang, 2015). Most of these methods suffer from technical, economical and health problems related to selectivity, long time of extraction and large quantity of hazardous materials used but the ion exchange resins appear to be one of the most effective techniques owning to its cost-effective, versatile and simple features to operate for removing trace levels of ions (Bhatnagar, Kumar, & Sillanp, 2011;Rafatullah, Sulaiman, Hashim, & Ahmad, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, various techniques have been applied for recovery and removal of uranium from its leach liquors or effluents such as precipitation (Mellah, Chegrouche, & Barkat, 2007;Zhang, Dodge, Malhotra, & Francis, 2013), co-precipitation (Aydin & Soylak, 2007;Reeder et al, 2001), solvent extraction (Agrawl, Shrivatav, & Mnom, 2000;Quinn, Wilkins, & Soldenhoff, 2013;Zhu, Pranolo, & Cheng, 2016), chromatographic extraction (Dietz, Philip, Sajdak, & Chiarizia, 2001;Prasada, Metilde, & Gladis, 2006), ion exchange (Gu, Ku, & Brown, 2005;Pulhani, Dafauti, & Hegde, 2012;Solgy, Taghizadeh, & Ghoddocynejad, 2015), membrane dialysis (Kedari, Pandit, & Gandhi, 2013;Bockris, 1972), solid phase extraction (Barbette et al, 2004;Keshtkar, Irani, & Moosavian, 2013;Song et al, 2012;Yousif, El-Afandy, Abdel-Wahab, Mubark, & Ibrahim, 2015;Zou & Zhao, 2012), ultrafiltration (Drozdzaka et al, 2016), nanofiltration (Shena & Sch€ aferb, 2014), resin-in-pulp (Sreenivas & Rajan, 2013), biosorption (Saini & Melo, 2015) and electrodeposition (Ko, Lim, Choi, Chung, & Kang, 2015). Most of these methods suffer from technical, economical and health problems related to selectivity, long time of extraction and large quantity of hazardous materials used but the ion exchange resins appear to be one of the most effective techniques owning to its cost-effective, versatile and simple features to operate for removing trace levels of ions (Bhatnagar, Kumar, & Sillanp, 2011;Rafatullah, Sulaiman, Hashim, & Ahmad, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When adsorption process follows pseudo first order, it implies that the metal ions are physically adsorbed onto the sorbent. On the other hand, the pseudo second order indicates that the adsorption process is a chemical progression [87,88]. The pseudo first, second order kinetic, Elovich and intraparticle diffusion models for Cr(VI) and Pb(II) are illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also added to the cellulose-GMA mixture was a combination of one mL isopropyl alcohol and 25 mL cyclohexane. All of the ingredients were combined in a flask containing 145 mL (%) polyvinyl alcohol dissolved in isopropanol and heated for 3 h in a water bath at 70-80 °C with constant stirring [30]. Grafted cellulose (GC) is a thick white precipitate that was generated, filtered out, rinsed with ethanol and distilled water, and then dried in the air.…”
Section: Grafted Cellulose Formulation (Cg)mentioning
confidence: 99%