2014
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2013.2286029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective State Retention Power Gating Based on Gate-Level Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this method requires a formal representation of the entire design, which is not always available, and also no automated techniques are proposed. The two recently published SSRPG approaches introduced by [16,17] provide pure formal methods for automatic selecting of all the FF's, which require retention and are essential for a proper system recovery upon power-up. Experimental results show a significant reduction of about 80% of the retention cells area overhead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this method requires a formal representation of the entire design, which is not always available, and also no automated techniques are proposed. The two recently published SSRPG approaches introduced by [16,17] provide pure formal methods for automatic selecting of all the FF's, which require retention and are essential for a proper system recovery upon power-up. Experimental results show a significant reduction of about 80% of the retention cells area overhead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, minimizing the number of retention FFs not only results in reducing the area overhead but also reduces the additional wiring required in SRPG. Although it is shown in [16] that a significant potential area reduction of about 9% of the chip area can be achieved, the added wiring required in SRPG is ignored. In SSRPG, the retention cells footprint can be simply deducted from the total cell area, but the wire-length deduction is not straightforward since it can only be obtained after completing the physical design flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably great benefits can be obtained by minimizing expected energy consumption at the system level. For example, we have found that it is possible to design the architecture with the possibility of involving elements responsible for power gating [20][21][22] of individual elements, or the clock gating [23][24][25]. Also, while reviewing methods to reduce energy consumption, the method of local voltage reduction was considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greenberg et al recently proposed methods [9,10] for automatically classifying all the flip-flops (FFs) of a given design into two categories: essential FF (e-FF) and redundant FF (r-FF). [10] performs the analysis according to read/write criteria on the synthesized gate-level netlist with Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) as the data structure, while [9] represented the criteria as a set of formal properties using propositional formulas and then uses common formal verification tools to drive the identification of the e-FFs. Even though the proposed approaches are formally sound, they are difficult to be applied by nonformal experts due to the required effort to provide proper input constraints using BDDs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, They need massive parallel processing to achieve reasonable runtime, leaving scalability a major concern. Compared with [9,10], our proposed method verifies power intention and retention scheme in the early phase of design flow by symbolic simulation [4,5], which allows us to handle not only gate-level but also RTL designs without logic synthesis. Performing the analysis at the RTL instead of gate-level makes it easier for the designer to inspect the results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%