2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10696-021-09434-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-adaptive memetic algorithms for multi-objective single machine learning-effect scheduling problems with release times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, despite the success and effectiveness of the meta-heuristic algorithms, their performance can vary across different problem domains (Zhang et al ., 2020). Due to the advantages of hyper-heuristics, many studies utilised the hyper-heuristic algorithms to tackle a wide range of optimisation problems such as university course timetabling (Bai et al ., 2007; Soria-Alcaraz et al ., 2016), knapsack problems (Gölcük and Ozsoydan, 2021), exam timetabling problems (Hao et al ., 2020), vehicle crash-worthiness problem (Li et al ., 2017), quadratic assignment problem (Dokeroglu and Cosar, 2016) and scheduling problems (Koulinas et al ., 2014; Hart and Sim, 2016; Lin et al ., 2017; Deliktaş, 2021). Furthermore, a few studies have explored the application of hyper-heuristic algorithms in addressing different assembly line variations, such as aircraft final ALB (Bao et al ., 2023), two-sided ALB (Rong et al ., 2023), stochastic parallel disassembly line balancing (Hu et al ., 2023), parallel ALB (Seçme and Özbakır, 2019; Özbakır and Seçme, 2022), mixed-model ALB (Ebrahimi et al ., 2023; Cano-Belmán et al ., 2010) and robotic parallel with type-II (Çil et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Solution Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, despite the success and effectiveness of the meta-heuristic algorithms, their performance can vary across different problem domains (Zhang et al ., 2020). Due to the advantages of hyper-heuristics, many studies utilised the hyper-heuristic algorithms to tackle a wide range of optimisation problems such as university course timetabling (Bai et al ., 2007; Soria-Alcaraz et al ., 2016), knapsack problems (Gölcük and Ozsoydan, 2021), exam timetabling problems (Hao et al ., 2020), vehicle crash-worthiness problem (Li et al ., 2017), quadratic assignment problem (Dokeroglu and Cosar, 2016) and scheduling problems (Koulinas et al ., 2014; Hart and Sim, 2016; Lin et al ., 2017; Deliktaş, 2021). Furthermore, a few studies have explored the application of hyper-heuristic algorithms in addressing different assembly line variations, such as aircraft final ALB (Bao et al ., 2023), two-sided ALB (Rong et al ., 2023), stochastic parallel disassembly line balancing (Hu et al ., 2023), parallel ALB (Seçme and Özbakır, 2019; Özbakır and Seçme, 2022), mixed-model ALB (Ebrahimi et al ., 2023; Cano-Belmán et al ., 2010) and robotic parallel with type-II (Çil et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Solution Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-criteria problems are usually solved using metaheuristics or hybrid metaheuristics, each with its special characteristics. The following are some of the approaches proposed by the authors: Deliktaş [114] to minimize makespan and total tardiness, Abedi et al [45] to minimize total weighted tardiness and total energy consumption, and Wang et al [115] to minimize the weighted sum of makespan and total completion time, used a memetic multiobjective algorithm to obtain a set of solutions. First, the authors develop a non-dominated sorting method, and second, the authors appeal to the Pareto front.…”
Section: Metaheuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%