2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2014.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-adjoint extensions for discrete linear Hamiltonian systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that (2.2) is a special discrete Hamiltonian system. By Theorems 5.5 and 7.1 in [12], T is a self-adjoint operator. Now, we show that T has a pure discrete spectrum and bounded from below.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that (2.2) is a special discrete Hamiltonian system. By Theorems 5.5 and 7.1 in [12], T is a self-adjoint operator. Now, we show that T has a pure discrete spectrum and bounded from below.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For more discussions on discrete Hamiltonian systems, we refer the reader to [11]. Recently, some important results have been obtained about the spectral theory of linear discrete Hamiltonian systems [12][13][14]. There are many good results on the existence of periodic, homoclinic, and heteroclinic orbits of discrete Hamiltonian systems [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following theorem which is from 27, Thm. 4.1] gives a relationship between the spectral properties of a selfadjoint extension subspace to those of the corresponding selfadjoint extension operator if the minimal operator generated by (1.1) is densely defined and the maximal operator is single‐valued.…”
Section: Hamiltonian Systems and Subspacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another difficulty that is always encountered in the difference systems is that the minimal operator generated by (1.1) may be neither densely defined nor single valued, its maximal operator may not be well defined and thus the selfadjoint extension operator for minimal operator cannot be discussed by application of von Neumann theory for densely defined Hermitian operators. This, therefore, requires the theory of Hermitian subspaces where the von Neumann theory has been extended in order to discuss the selfadjoint extension of the minimal Hermitian subspaces and for more details see 25–27, 29 and the references cited therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the first author of the present paper applied the above Coddington results in [14] to extend the GlazmanKrein-Naimark (GKN) theory for symmetric operators to Hermitian subspaces [17]. Applying this GKN theory, she with Sun, and with Ren gave complete characterizations of self-adjoint extensions for second-order symmetric linear difference equations and general linear discrete Hamiltonian systems in both regular and singular cases, separately [6,18]. For more results about non-densely defined Hermitian operators or Hermitian subspaces, we refer to [11][12][13][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and some references cited therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%