2010
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201002558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self‐Assembly of Nanotriangle Superlattices Facilitated by Repulsive Electrostatic Interactions

Abstract: Self-assembly of nanoscopic components into ordered "suprastructures" is a promising route to new types of nanomaterials with applications in catalysis, [1] optoelectronics, [2] and biological sensing, [3] to name just a few. Whereas numerous strategies (mostly, evaporation-driven [4][5][6][7][8] but also based on electrostatic interactions [9][10][11][12] or DNA base-pairing [13] ) have been developed to crystallize spherical particles into large two-dimensional lattices and three-dimensional crystals, the se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrostatic repulsion sometimes dominants self‐assembly processes and facilitates superlattice formation. Grzybowski's group synthesized equilateral triangle gold nanoplates in aqua solution with a side length of 158 ± 14 nm and 8.7 ± 0.8 nm thickness . The van der Waals forces between nanotriangles can be maximized when nanoplates stacked “on top” of one another, which could further be estimated through the Hamaker integral approximation: EvdW=A[1/d22/(d+h)2+1/(d+2h)2]/12πwhere A is the Hamaker constant and d is the inter‐plate distance, and h is the thickness of the nanoplates.…”
Section: Electrostatic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrostatic repulsion sometimes dominants self‐assembly processes and facilitates superlattice formation. Grzybowski's group synthesized equilateral triangle gold nanoplates in aqua solution with a side length of 158 ± 14 nm and 8.7 ± 0.8 nm thickness . The van der Waals forces between nanotriangles can be maximized when nanoplates stacked “on top” of one another, which could further be estimated through the Hamaker integral approximation: EvdW=A[1/d22/(d+h)2+1/(d+2h)2]/12πwhere A is the Hamaker constant and d is the inter‐plate distance, and h is the thickness of the nanoplates.…”
Section: Electrostatic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows that nanoplates ordering depends predominantly on repulsive electrostatic interactions between the nanoplates introduced by charged surfactants. 45 One of the main motivations for the preparation of nanoplates arrays is their use in SERS substrates. Figure 7(c) showed the SERS spectra of NBA (Raman report molecule) on monolayer and head-to-head arrays.…”
Section: Controlled Assembly Of Gold Nanoplates For Surface Enhanced mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Electrostatic forces are particularly relevant for directing self-assembly due to the tunable direction and strength of these forces. 3,4 Top-down methods such as e-beam lithography can be used to fabricate nanoscale electrodes or to create charge patterns on a scaffold, which in turn can direct the self-assembly process. 5,6 These methods offer the promise to create non-periodic nanostructures via directed self-assembly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%