2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.82.045105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-consistentGWdetermination of the interaction strength: Application to the iron arsenide superconductors

Abstract: We introduce a first principles approach to determine the strength of the electronic correlations based on the fully self consistent GW approximation. The approach provides a seamless interface with dynamical mean field theory, and gives good results for well studied correlated materials such as NiO. Applied to the recently discovered iron arsenide materials, it accounts for the noticeable correlation features observed in optics and photoemission while explaining the absence of visible satellites in X-ray abso… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

6
109
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The double-counting functional is expressed as Φ dc (n d ) = n d E dc , where E dc = U(n 0 d − 1/2) − J/2(n 0 d − 1) and the nominal occupancy n 0 d of Ir ion in CaIrO 3 is 5. Due to the large energy window, the local Coulomb interaction parameters are relatively system-independent and estimated [27] as U ≈ 4.5 eV and J ≈ 0.8 eV [28]. We set different local coordinates on each Ir atom in order to simulate the antiferromagnetic structure.…”
Section: Computational Details Of the Dft+dmft Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double-counting functional is expressed as Φ dc (n d ) = n d E dc , where E dc = U(n 0 d − 1/2) − J/2(n 0 d − 1) and the nominal occupancy n 0 d of Ir ion in CaIrO 3 is 5. Due to the large energy window, the local Coulomb interaction parameters are relatively system-independent and estimated [27] as U ≈ 4.5 eV and J ≈ 0.8 eV [28]. We set different local coordinates on each Ir atom in order to simulate the antiferromagnetic structure.…”
Section: Computational Details Of the Dft+dmft Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the experimentally observed large electrical resistivity ("bad metal" with k F l ∼ 1), a strong suppression of Drude weight 4 , and the temperatureinduced spectral weight transfer [5][6][7] have suggested sizable strength of electronic correlations. These experimental evidences have suggested the placement of the iron pnictides in close proximity of a putative Mott transition [8][9][10] . In a metallic system close to a Mott transition, quasi-local moments are expected to arise, which for the iron pnictides are described in terms of J 1 − J 2 couplings 8,9 ; here J 1 and J 2 refer to nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor spin exchange interactions on the iron square lattice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36) with (unless otherwise specified) U=5.0 eV and J=0.85 eV, consistent with estimates in the literature for Fe in various compounds. 10,11,37,38 A double counting term is needed to remove the on-site d interactions present in the Hartree and exchance-correlation functionals. We use the spin-independent form of Anisimov 19…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%