2022
DOI: 10.1177/13621688221102686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-determination mini-theories in second language learning: A systematic review of three decades of research

Abstract: Self-determination theory is one of the most established motivational theories both within second language learning and beyond. This theory has generated several mini-theories, namely: organismic integration theory, cognitive evaluation theory, basic psychological needs theory, goal contents theory, causality orientations theory, and relationships motivation theory. After providing an up-to-date account of these mini-theories, we present the results of a systematic review of empirical second language research … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneously, as students gain familiarity and establish supportive learning relationships with their course instructor, they are more likely to adopt proactive learning behaviors that demonstrate agentic engagement. Overall, these findings lend support to the notion that engagement (and its counterpart disengagement) is a construct best characterized as dynamic and malleable which requires research designs (e.g., longitudinal studies) that can capture this dynamic, temporal perspective (Al-Hoorie et al, 2022;Noels, Lou, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Temporal Dynamics Of L2 Student Engagementsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simultaneously, as students gain familiarity and establish supportive learning relationships with their course instructor, they are more likely to adopt proactive learning behaviors that demonstrate agentic engagement. Overall, these findings lend support to the notion that engagement (and its counterpart disengagement) is a construct best characterized as dynamic and malleable which requires research designs (e.g., longitudinal studies) that can capture this dynamic, temporal perspective (Al-Hoorie et al, 2022;Noels, Lou, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Temporal Dynamics Of L2 Student Engagementsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…As Ryan and Deci (2020) point out, individuals' needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness are inherent motivational resources. When these needs are satisfied in the language classroom, optimal functioning and psychological well-being are fostered, resulting in engagement (Al-Hoorie et al, 2022); when these needs are frustrated, suboptimal, or even maladaptive functioning and psychological illbeing are caused, resulting in disengagement (Howard et al, 2021). In line with these theoretical understandings, in this study we test the proposition that changes in student engagement and disengagement over time are related specifically to changes in students' basic psychological needs.…”
Section: Antecedents Of Student Engagementmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Organismic integration theory (OIT) is a mini-theory of the greatest interest ( Al-Hoorie et al, 2022 ). It classifies motivation into three types, namely, amotivation, extrinsic motivation, and intrinsic motivation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Chen et al (2021) have applied the basic psychological needs theory and the relationship motivation theory in the Chinese context, Alamer and Lee (2021) in the Saudi Aribian context, Carreira (2012) in the Japanese context, and more commonly in the American ( Davis, 2022 ) and British contexts ( Parrish, 2020 ). Moreover, several mini-theories (e.g., organismic integration theory, cognitive evaluation theory, basic psychological needs theory, and goal contents theory) of SDT have also been generated ( Al-Hoorie et al, 2022 ). In addition, results from co-citation analysis of references reveal the possible trajectory of the development of the existing theoretical models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%