1987
DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1987.9713679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Disclosure of Homosexual Orientation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies highlight various factors, such as anonymity and asynchronicity, which contribute to users disclosing more online than they necessarily would in a face-to-face situation (Krasnova et al 2010, Suler 2004. Whilst some self-disclosure, for example coming-out, can put an individual at an increased risk of negative acts towards them (Herek 1996, Wells andKline 1987), individuals still choose to make such disclosure in public online spaces (Alexander 2002b, Alexander and Losh 2010, Drushel 2010, Munt Bassett and O'Riordan 2002, Rak 2005. Additionally, research has identified three classifications as to why non-heterosexuals choose to inform others about their sexuality: improving interpersonal relationships, enhancing one's mental and physical health, and 4 changing society's attitudes (Herek 1996).…”
Section: Online Self-disclosurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies highlight various factors, such as anonymity and asynchronicity, which contribute to users disclosing more online than they necessarily would in a face-to-face situation (Krasnova et al 2010, Suler 2004. Whilst some self-disclosure, for example coming-out, can put an individual at an increased risk of negative acts towards them (Herek 1996, Wells andKline 1987), individuals still choose to make such disclosure in public online spaces (Alexander 2002b, Alexander and Losh 2010, Drushel 2010, Munt Bassett and O'Riordan 2002, Rak 2005. Additionally, research has identified three classifications as to why non-heterosexuals choose to inform others about their sexuality: improving interpersonal relationships, enhancing one's mental and physical health, and 4 changing society's attitudes (Herek 1996).…”
Section: Online Self-disclosurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first involved self-acceptance as a prerequisite to disclosure, and the second involved self-acceptance as a motivation to disclose. Past literature has suggested that there is a connection between psychological wellbeing and disclosure, in that self-acceptance has been defined as a prerequisite to disclosure (Wells & Kline, 1987), as well as an assumed consequence of disclosing (Galatzer-Levy & Cohler, 2002). Studies that have focused on other stigmatized populations (e.g., individuals with epilepsy and learning disabilities; Schneider & Conrad, 1980;Valle, Solis, & Volpitta, 2004) have also identified self-acceptance as being an important factor in the decision to disclose one's stigmatized identity.…”
Section: Self-acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-acceptance has also been identified as a goal of disclosure, and thus serves as a reason why individuals with stigmatized identities choose to disclose (Cain, 1991;Schneider & Conrad, 1980;Wells & Kline, 1987). For example, some of the out lesbian athletes believed that disclosure would bolster self-acceptance.…”
Section: Self-acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a heterosexual actor's perspective, then, IM should seem particularly likely when the audience for a gender role violation consists of men. IM should also seem relatively likely when the audience consists of strangers, given that people are more likely to disclose personal information, such as sexual orientation and other identity-relevant details, to friends than to strangers (Reis & Shaver, 1988;Wells & Kline, 1987). That is, friends presumably know how actors identify their sexual orientation, and are thus unlikely sources of IM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%