Self-Efficacy of Older People Using Technology to Self-Manage COPD, Hypertension, Heart Failure, or Dementia at Home: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background and Objectives Although telehealth research among the general population is voluminous, the quality of studies is low and results are mixed. Little is known specifically concerning older people and their self-efficacy to engage with and benefit from such technologies. This article reviews the evidence for which self-care telehealth technology supports the self-efficacy of older people with long-term conditions (LTCs) living at home. Research Design and Methods Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement (PRISMA) guidelines, this overview of systematic reviews focused on four LTCs and the concept of “self-efficacy.” Quality was appraised using R-AMSTAR and study evaluation was guided by the PRISMS taxonomy for reporting of self-management support. Heterogeneous data evidencing technology-enhanced self-efficacy were narratively synthesized. Results Five included articles contained 74 primary studies involving 9,004 participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, heart failure, or dementia. Evidence for self-care telehealth technology supporting the self-efficacy of older people with LTCs living at home was limited. Self-efficacy was rarely an outcome, also attrition and dropout rates and mediators of support or education. The pathway from telehealth to self-efficacy depended on telehealth modes and techniques promoting healthy lifestyles. Increased self-care and self-monitoring empowered self-efficacy, patient activation, or mastery. Discussion and Implications Future research needs to focus on the process by which the intervention works and the effects of mediating variables and mechanisms through which self-management is achieved. Self-efficacy, patient activation, and motivation are critical components to telehealth’s adoption by the patient and hence to the success of self-care in self-management of LTCs. Their invisibility as outcomes is a limitation.

Tele-health interventions to support self-management in adults with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

“…Longer-term effects of the intervention on other associated RA outcomes such as pain or fatigue scores could also have been considered. Chalfont et al [38] supports that tele-health interventions focussed on improvement of patient self-efficacy and selfmanagement may lead to improved health behaviours. These studies were implemented to support patients to self-manage on discharge from hospital which has been recognised as a vulnerable time for patients.…”

Does Connected Health Technology Improve Health-Related Outcomes in Rural Cardiac Populations? Systematic Review Narrative Synthesis

“…Most participants included within the five studies were above 65 years old, which may explain why in some studies low compliance rates or issues with the different forms of technology were found. Older adults have been shown to experience issues using and accepting technology due to technology literacy [ 45 ], costs [ 46 ], self-efficacy [ 47 ], attitudes [ 48 ] and anxiety [ 49 ]. Investigating acceptability, adherence, usability, or feedback in relation to the technology was deemed important, as the sustained utilisation of connected health technologies can increase longer-term engagement, motivation, and physical activity levels [ 50 ].…”

Design and Development of an eHealth Service for Collaborative Self-Management among Older Adults with Chronic Diseases: A Theory-Driven User-Centered Approach

“…It has been suggested that the design of self-management support features needs to be aligned with varying user needs and preferences based on patients’ medical and social complexities, demographic factors, readiness for change, and motivation [ 56 , 57 ]. However, there is no conclusive evidence yet about which eHealth components and design features are most effective to support self-management of long-term conditions [ 12 , 58 ]. Thus, more research is needed to uncover relationships between the context, mechanisms, and self-management outcomes related to eHealth interventions [ 59 ].…”