Self, Identity, and Social Institutions

MacKinnon, Neil J.; Heise, David R.

doi:10.1057/9780230108493

Cited by 136 publications

(203 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

197

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Conversely, those at the bottom of society have considerably fewer resources and are more dependent on Intimate Relations and weak ties, thus assigning a more positive meaning to them-in particular relative to Occupational Identities that are most likely less important for lowstatus individuals' self-conceptions. An alternative to this social structural interpretation of findings is that variation in affective meanings across strata might be brought about by systematic differences in affective self-meanings and the ecology of everyday social interactions between members of different status groups (58).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consensus and stratification in the affective meaning of human sociality

Ambrasat

Scheve

Conrad

et al. 2014

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigate intrasocietal consensus and variation in affective meanings of concepts related to authority and community, two elementary forms of human sociality. Survey participants (n = 2,849) from different socioeconomic status (SES) groups in German society provided ratings of 909 social concepts along three basic dimensions of affective meaning. Results show widespread consensus on these meanings within society and demonstrate that a meaningful structure of socially shared knowledge emerges from organizing concepts according to their affective similarity. The consensus finding is further qualified by evidence for subtle systematic variation along SES differences. In relation to affectively neutral words, high-status individuals evaluate intimacyrelated and socially desirable concepts as less positive and powerful than middle-or low-status individuals, while perceiving antisocial concepts as relatively more threatening. This systematic variation across SES groups suggests that the affective meaning of sociality is to some degree a function of social stratification.cultural concensus | affect control theory | large-scale survey | cluster analysis | mixed-effects models

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consensus and stratification in the affective meaning of human sociality

Ambrasat

Scheve

Conrad

et al. 2014

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hal ini didasarkan pada penelitian sejak perkembangan awal sampai era sekarang, bahwa identitas sosial terbukti menyebabkan konflik (MacKinnon & Heise, 2010;Turner & Reynolds, 2003;Livingstone & Haslam, 2008 ). Penelitian lain membuktikan bahwa identitas sosial menyebabkan konflik, yaitu Kelman (2005) membuktikan identitas sosial yang terwujud melalui identitas nasional berperan terhadap kasus konflik Palestina dan Israel.…”

Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified

Pengembangan Model Sistem Peringatan Dini Konflik Menggunakan Prediktor Identitas Sosial

Suyono

Suryanto

2017

HUMANITAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to investigate the modeling of conflict early warning system through social identity consists of categorization, group identification, and group bias. This study uses a quantitative approach to modifying the three methods: a structural model, type sequential models, types conjunctual models.. This Study involve 279 of member of Paguyuban Petani Lahan Pantai Kulon Progo as respondents that was chosen through proportion random sampling. Analysis to used second order confirmatory factor analysis resulted in the finding that social identity consisting of categorization, group identification, and group bias proved to be a predictor conflict. According to the particularities of the early warning system can be given a recommendation as a preventive measure so that that conflict does not escalate into manifest. Recommendations can be given more attention is the dimension of group bias due to give the largest contribution as forming a social identity by minimizing group bias. The Precautions taken are the outsiders were able to establish cooperation with the farmers. Out group helpful as a comparison without group. Out group are groups that become the reference for farmers. Reference of out group is to decrease the group bias.Keywords: categorization, conflict early warning system, group bias, group identification, social identity AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan pemodelan dengan prediktor identitas sosial terdiri dari kategorisasi, identifikasi kelompok, dan bias kelompok. Dalam rangka mencapai tujuan penelitian bahwa penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan memodifikasi tiga metode yaitu model struktural, type sequential models, dan type conjunctual model. Adapun populasi penelitian adalah anggota Paguyuban Petani Lahan Pantai Kulon Progo. Pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian dengan proporsi area random sampling. Responden berjumlah 279. Analisis model menggunakan second order confirmatory factor analysis menghasilkan temuan bahwa identitas sosial yang terdiri dari kategorisasi, identifikasi kelompok, dan bias kelompok terbukti menjadi prediktor konflik. Sesuai kekhasan sistem peringatan dini sebagai tindakan preventif, maka berdasarkan hasil penelitian merekomendasikan lebih memperhatikan dimensi bias kelompok karena memberi kontribusi terbesar sebagai pembentuk identitas sosial.

show abstract

“…Rather, new information is received and processed selectively so as to be in agreement with existing desires, expectations and goals-the human's mental models [60]. It is therefore crucial to the success of an innovation that the cognitive perceptions and evaluations of it can not only be integrated into existing mental models, but also appeal to the emotional side of the equation [61,62].…”

Section: Mental Models Of Autonomous Drivingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The raw results (average evaluations on the scales valence, potency and activation) are displayed in Table 6.2. The results were used to calculate the Euclidian distances and thus the affective similarity between the term "ideal drive" and the other terms (for methodological details see [ 61,66]). A visualization of these calculations is provided by Fig.…”

Section: Representations Of the Driver's Role And Use Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Interaction Between Humans and Autonomous Agents

Wolf

2016

Autonomous Driving

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Self, Identity, and Social Institutions

Cited by 136 publications

References 0 publications

Consensus and stratification in the affective meaning of human sociality

Consensus and stratification in the affective meaning of human sociality

Pengembangan Model Sistem Peringatan Dini Konflik Menggunakan Prediktor Identitas Sosial

The Interaction Between Humans and Autonomous Agents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About