2005
DOI: 10.2118/84064-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Learning Reservoir Management

Abstract: Summary In this work, we present an industrial automation framework for control and optimization of hydrocarbon-producing fields while satisfying business and physical constraints. The all-encompassing reservoir-management problem is decomposed into a hierarchy of decision-making problems at different time scales. We exemplify the proposed approach through a case study on a multiple-layer reservoir with a classical waterflood problem, in which a numerical reservoir model is used a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, also in that case, the short-term production strategy will most likely not be determined a priori using only simulation results, but rather in real time, using production measurements, while constrained by limits to ensure that the long-term reservoir-management objectives are also met. Such multilevel control concepts were described by De et al (2000), Nyhavn et al (2000), and Saputelli et al (2003). However, until closed-loop approaches are matured, production optimization in reality will remain a short-term-focused activity, aimed at maximizing oil production while satisfying production constraints.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, also in that case, the short-term production strategy will most likely not be determined a priori using only simulation results, but rather in real time, using production measurements, while constrained by limits to ensure that the long-term reservoir-management objectives are also met. Such multilevel control concepts were described by De et al (2000), Nyhavn et al (2000), and Saputelli et al (2003). However, until closed-loop approaches are matured, production optimization in reality will remain a short-term-focused activity, aimed at maximizing oil production while satisfying production constraints.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Great effort has been devoted to constructing high-order reservoir models for improved oil recovery [1,2]. Unfortunately, the accurate characterization of certain parameters in the simulation, such as rock porosity and permeability, is a difficult task to be performed, requiring large amounts of computational effort and storage [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they were basically off-line applications of optimal control theory that do not explicitly use real-time data computations. Real-time, modelbased control applications have been introduced in the literature, recently for oil recovery [3]. One of the fundamental difficulties in designing such controllers for large-scale reservoir management stems from the fact that reservoir simulation models, given by PDE's with highly heterogeneous system parameters, yield large state-space dimensions (on the order of tens of thousands to millions) upon discretizations and, in turn, large dimensions for model-based controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maintain the desired operating conditions, this type of feedback controller is frequently used in production and refining processes in the petroleum industry (Wang et al 2000;Havre and Dalsmo 2001;van Dijk et al 2008;Bieker et al 2007;Sengul and Bekkousha 2002;Stenhouse 2006;Oberwinkler and Stundner 2005;Saputelli et al 2005;Nikolaou et al 2006;Guyaguler 2009). The control systems implemented in facilities and refineries have sensors and mechanical equipment to observe and physically modify the process settings.…”
Section: Proportional-integral-derivative (Pid) Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%