Self-maintenance vs. goal attainment: drivers of mortality anxiety in organized civil society

Abstract

When do membership-based civil society organizations such as interest groups, political parties or service-oriented organizations consider their existence under threat? Distinguishing pressures of organizational self-maintenance from functional pressures of goal attainment, which all voluntary membership organizations – irrespective of their political or societal functions - need to reconcile, we propose a framework theorizing distinct categories of drivers of mortality anxiety in organized civil society. To test our hypotheses, we apply ordered logistic regression analysis to new data covering regionally and nationally active interest groups, service-oriented organizations and parties in Germany, Norway, Switzerland and the UK. We find that factors enhancing intraorganizational resilience thereby facilitating self-maintenance as well as exposure to different representation challenges complicating goal attainment have significant effects on mortality anxiety experienced by interest groups, political parties and service-oriented organizations alike – the former reducing, the latter enhancing it. Stressing the importance of a stable, durable organizational infrastructure with loyal and involved members to operate in increasingly volatile and diverse environments, our findings highlight the on-going importance of ‘traditional’ (sometimes considered ‘outdated’) organization-building.

Badge of Courage or Sign of Criminality? Experimental Evidence for How Voters Respond to Candidates Who Were Arrested at a Protest

“…The second section describes our research methods and reports our results. Our third and final section is a conclusion that discusses the broader implications of our findings (Bolleyer and Correa, 2020; Farrer, 2017; Fraussen and Halpin, 2018; Gause, 2020; Gillion, 2013; Vráblíková and Císař, 2019; Wasow, 2020).…”

It Is All About Money! What Drives Interest Groups’ Relations with Political Parties in Central and Eastern Europe?

“…Apart from interest groups’ ability to assure survival, the most important goal is to develop strategies to access and maximize influence on policy-making processes (Bolleyer and Correa, 2020; Lowery, 2007). Pfeffer and Salancik (2003: 258) even argue that to survive and pursue their goals, interest groups need to access certain resources, which might be in control by other institutions.…”

“…Interest groups and political parties are two phenomena that used to be studied separately; however, the recent wave of studies attempted to shed more light on interactions between these two actors or study them together (Allern, 2010;Allern and Bale, 2012;Allern et al, 2021aAllern et al, , 2021bBerkhout et al, 2021;Beyers et al, 2015;Bolleyer and Correa, 2020;De Bruycker, 2016;Otjes and Rasmussen, 2017;Rasmussen and Lindeboom, 2013).…”

Civil society – Politically engaged or member-serving? A governance perspective

“…It takes the value 1 if the membership is ‘predominantly composed of individual citizens’ and 0 otherwise. Fourth, in line with earlier work (e.g., Bolleyer and Correa, 2020), the survey asked about different types of staff working for the organization, including the number of volunteers an organization relies on. The variable has a right-skewed distribution, which is why I include the log.…”

“…Both have right-skewed distributions, thus, I use the logarithmic versions. I further control for Competitor, a dichotomous variable based on a survey item that asks whether organizations face similar organizations with whom they compete for new members, funds, government contracts or other key resources or not (e.g., Bolleyer and Correa, 2020). Organizations exposed to Resource Competition are coded 1, those which are not 0.…”