2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2011.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-mixing interference in an all-fiberized configuration Er3+–Yb3+ codoped distributed Bragg reflector laser for vibration measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that SMI operates in a low-feedback regime where the effect of multiple reflections in the external cavity is small, the interference signal detected by the photodetector (PD) with sinusoidal phase modulation φ(t) is given by [15][16][17] where I 0 denotes the unperturbed optical output power, φ(t) is the measured phase of the external cavity, m is the fringe visibility, n is the refractive index of air, L(t) is the length of the external cavity, and λ 0 is the central wavelength in vacuum. φ(t)=asin(2πf m t+β) is the sinusoidal phase modulation term, where a is the modulation depth, f m is the modulation frequency, and β is the initial phase.…”
Section: Manuscript Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that SMI operates in a low-feedback regime where the effect of multiple reflections in the external cavity is small, the interference signal detected by the photodetector (PD) with sinusoidal phase modulation φ(t) is given by [15][16][17] where I 0 denotes the unperturbed optical output power, φ(t) is the measured phase of the external cavity, m is the fringe visibility, n is the refractive index of air, L(t) is the length of the external cavity, and λ 0 is the central wavelength in vacuum. φ(t)=asin(2πf m t+β) is the sinusoidal phase modulation term, where a is the modulation depth, f m is the modulation frequency, and β is the initial phase.…”
Section: Manuscript Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 A fiber-optic vibration sensor can typically be based on the modulation of the light properties in the optical fiber, such as intensity, phase, polarization state, and frequency, where these are (mainly) caused by externally applied vibration (and compensation for extraneous effects such as temperature can be included). The most common fiber-optic vibration sensors discussed in the literature are point, [18][19][20][21] quasi-distributed, 22 and distributed sensors. 23,24 Different (and often complementary) optical techniques can be employed for each of these.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, fiber-optic vibration sensors mainly consist of point [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ], quasi-distributed [ 15 ], and distributed sensors [ 16 , 17 ]. Several schemes of point sensors including fiber Bragg grating (FBG), Fabry–Pérot [ 18 , 19 ], self-mixing [ 20 ], and Doppler vibrometry [ 21 , 22 ] are deployed for vibration measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%