2010
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2009.2023817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Monitoring and Self-Assessing Atomic Clocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally speaking, there are two methods to evaluate atomic clocks: (1) comparing the clock signal with standard reference whose stability is much better than the evaluated clock and (2) making intercomparison among three or more clocks whose stability is almost the same. Because there is no standard reference in the satellite and the performance of satellite clocks is similar, we make use of the second method to realize Self-Monitoring for anomalies.…”
Section: Self-monitoring Methods For Anomaly Of Satellitementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally speaking, there are two methods to evaluate atomic clocks: (1) comparing the clock signal with standard reference whose stability is much better than the evaluated clock and (2) making intercomparison among three or more clocks whose stability is almost the same. Because there is no standard reference in the satellite and the performance of satellite clocks is similar, we make use of the second method to realize Self-Monitoring for anomalies.…”
Section: Self-monitoring Methods For Anomaly Of Satellitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, researchers have proposed schemes to monitor anomalies of clock, such as Interferometric Detection Method [1], Least Square (LS) Detection Method [2,3], Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT) [4][5][6], Kalman Filtering Method [7][8][9][10], and Dynamic Allan Variance (DAVAR) Method [5,[11][12][13]. Though their schemes have been proved to be effective for some (not all) anomalies, some extra work is still needed to realize Self-Monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slope of the cumulative sum reflects the average behavior of the measurement and can be used to detect frequency jumps. Other techniques for fault detection in clock signals include trend analysis and filtering of the frequency signal [18][19][20], the optimal stopping method [21], and interferometric analysis [22]. Fault detection in clock ensembles is further discussed in [23][24][25] using Kalman filters.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each of these we devise a dedicated detector based on the generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT), which accounts for the statistical distribution of the observable in both nominal and faulty conditions. We derive a model-based test and a [7][8][9][10][11] This work Dynamic Allan variance [12][13][14][15][16] This work Trend analysis-smoothing-recursive filters [18][19][20] [ 27, 28] Optimal stopping method [21] -Average, least-squares, standard deviation on sliding windows [17] [ 26] Interferometry [22] self-consistency test. In the model-based test the detector compares the current observation to the value predicted by a clock model: any deviation between the two can originate from a fault, but also from a mismodelling of the expected behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our "interferometric method," we compare a clock's signal with a delayed version of itself [2]. Specifically, the output signal of our interferometric system is proportional to the clock's fractional frequency deviation, Δy, averaged over the delay, Δt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%