2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12279-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-propulsion of Leidenfrost Drops between Non-Parallel Structures

Abstract: In this work, we explored self-propulsion of a Leidenfrost drop between non-parallel structures. A theoretical model was first developed to determine conditions for liquid drops to start moving away from the corner of two non-parallel plates. These conditions were then simplified for the case of a Leidenfrost drop. Furthermore, ejection speeds and travel distances of Leidenfrost drops were derived using a scaling law. Subsequently, the theoretical models were validated by experiments. Finally, three new device… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also a force caused by the difference in Laplace pressure between the front and rear bubble meniscieach with a different radius of curvature due to the changing gap height [39]. Δp = γ(1/R1_front -1/R1_back), here R1_front and R1_back are the front and rear meniscus radius, which can be found geometrically [41] and which differ due the changing gap. For the bubble geometry in Figure 7, this approach suggests a force of around ~75 µN (see Supporting Information 2.6) directed in the upstream direction (due to the non-wetting nature of the bubble in a gap that converges in the direction of flow).…”
Section: Supporting Information 25)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a force caused by the difference in Laplace pressure between the front and rear bubble meniscieach with a different radius of curvature due to the changing gap height [39]. Δp = γ(1/R1_front -1/R1_back), here R1_front and R1_back are the front and rear meniscus radius, which can be found geometrically [41] and which differ due the changing gap. For the bubble geometry in Figure 7, this approach suggests a force of around ~75 µN (see Supporting Information 2.6) directed in the upstream direction (due to the non-wetting nature of the bubble in a gap that converges in the direction of flow).…”
Section: Supporting Information 25)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Droplet transport and control have always had potential applications in the fields of industry, medicine, biotechnology, and microfluidics. There are some droplet motion phenomena in nature, such as shorebirds feed through their beaks, , spider silk to directionally collect water, rice leaves with anisotropic sliding properties have the ability to directionally control the movement of water droplets, and water transport on peristome surfaces . Inspired by these natural phenomena, some special structures based on bionics can be used to drive droplet motion. According to the previous studies, it can be concluded that one of the key factors to drive droplet motion is the surface structure whose differences mainly derive from materials and geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also reported the bidirectional motion of the droplet barrel within a wedge-shaped space composed of two hydrophobic SLIPS and conducted theoretical investigations which were important outcomes and formulated a general framework to inspire the design of self-propelled droplet transport. , However, the droplet constrained in-between the wedge-shaped space of two hydrophobic SLIPS moves slowly and tends to stop at an equivalent position where the driving force equals the sliding resistance, which manifests the difficulty of long-distance droplet transport. Although the use of the wedge-shaped structure combined with the Leidenfrost effect can initiate ultrafast droplet self-propulsion, the surface temperature needs to be carefully manipulated, and it is not applicable for controlled long-term transport because of the evaporation of the liquid droplets. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%