Self-reflective transformational-transformative co-ordinations of the psychological

Gülerce, Aydan

doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.09.014

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…So, I rapidly redress the same (but almost stripped) signifiers of the potential present (''MIRACLE'') as they call (intentional objects) and suggest (seductive objects) me (an human object-subject-project) to present some meaning-potentials from within my knowledge-practice orientation (e.g. Gu¨lerce, 1997Gu¨lerce, , 2010Gu¨lerce, , 2014 in this writing style: M: Multitude of philosophical perspectives in transformative motion as (post)metaphysics and (post)mentality of dialogical multiplectics (Gu¨lerce, 2014a(Gu¨lerce, , 2014b. Minormedium-major transformations are viewed via micro-meso-macro lenses in transdisciplinary analyses in multiple (diachronic, synchronic, anachronic) timespace that demands more of (culture of) psychology than multiplicity of, or mixed methodology.…”

Section: Prospective Presentmentioning

confidence: 99%

The “&” has emerged. Seeking “culture” and “psychology” for Culture & Psychology

Gülerce

2015

Culture & Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of Culture & Psychology, the author retrospectively evaluates the journal's metatheoretical and theoretical developmental trajectories. For this purpose, seven editorials were treated as the primary texts in the foreground as evaluative reflections of the knowledge field themselves. And in the background, the author's own readership and conceptualizations inevitably provided the additional intellectual material for this brief essay. First, she highlights the journal's initial aspirations for culture-inclusive psychology scholarship it welcomes, the necessary and (im)possible tasks and the evaluative standards it sets for itself. They are presented as the identity developmental markers and grouped around seven axiomatic themes. Second, the possible sources of ''developmental delays,'' ''deviations'' from its valued norms, or for the ''unattained'' ideals as judged by its own standards, are sorted out in terms of implicit/ explicit knowledge positions presupposed within the heterogeneity of the scholarship. Third, the achievements and/or determinate decisions are acknowledged. Lastly, the author critically reflects from within her own perspectivally prospective perspective towards further transformations of contemporary psychology as culture/culture as psychology.

show abstract

Section: Prospective Presentmentioning

confidence: 99%

The “&” has emerged. Seeking “culture” and “psychology” for Culture & Psychology

Gülerce

2015

Culture & Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, from where I stand (e.g. Gu¨lerce, 2010Gu¨lerce, , 2013, and overall, most chapters are already deeply soaked in the metatheoretical presuppositions, theoretical and methodological commitments of the traditional worldview while they offer ad hoc applications of DST. The reader would be intrigued by each chapter and, perhaps, think further towards 'overcoming' not only dualistic, elementalistic and mechanistic mentality and research.…”

Section: Handbook Of Dstmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In my conceptualization (e.g. Gülerce, 2013), the identity , as an ontological–epistemological category, belongs to the symbolic reality . Every identification is regulated by some soci(et)al order, or discourse, from without, towards sameness and homogeneity, within its general normative system.…”

Section: Dialogical Self: Terms In Contradiction or A Postmodern Paradoxmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selfing as, with, and without othering: Dialogical (im)possibilities with Dialogical Self Theory

Gülerce

2014

Culture & Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This essay critically reflects on the hegemonic conceptions of the self and its instrumentalization in modern psychology to fit modern Western society in general. Not only that various metaphysical, metatheoretical, theoretical and methodological commitments are seen as serious obstacles to fulfil the apparent epistemological desire for a paradigmatic shift towards a dynamic, relational and pluralist worldview as illustrated by Dialogical Self Theory in particular but also the conceptual confusion between various key categories of human subjectivity such as the self, identity, otherness, difference, alterity, sociality and the reductionism of position categories is drawn attention to. Departing from the Handbook of Dialogical Self Theory, Dialogical Self Theory's appropriation of Bakhtinian notion of dialogic is put into question. In order to accentuate the moral, historical and sociopolitical aspects of dialogical self-reflexivity and psychic, microgenetic, ontogenetic and socicogenetic processes, the concept of 'selfing' is introduced in three distinct relations with the concept of 'othering' for its significant implications for the post-/late-modern glocal world.

show abstract

Dialectical pluralism: A theoretical conceptualization of pluralism in psychology

Goertzen

2010

New Ideas in Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Self-reflective transformational-transformative co-ordinations of the psychological

Cited by 11 publications

References 15 publications

The “&” has emerged. Seeking “culture” and “psychology” for Culture & Psychology

The “&” has emerged. Seeking “culture” and “psychology” for Culture & Psychology

Selfing as, with, and without othering: Dialogical (im)possibilities with Dialogical Self Theory

Dialectical pluralism: A theoretical conceptualization of pluralism in psychology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About