2018
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/bf6kg
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Regulated Studying Behavior, and the Social Norms that Influence It

Abstract: Teachers use injunctive norms when telling students what they should be doing. But researchers find that sometimes descriptive norms, information about what others are doing, more powerfully influence behavior. Currently, we examine which norm is more effective at increasing self-regulated studying and performance in an online college course. We found injunctive norms increased study behaviors aimed at fulfilling course requirements (completion of assigned activities), but did not improve learning outcomes. De… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to Experiment 1, which estimated the benefit of automated deadline reminders over instructor announcements, Experiment 2 estimated the cumulative benefit of both types of notifications, comingled in the same pragmatic treatment. Considering that instructor announcements do have benefits for student motivation (e.g., [39]) and behavior (e.g., [40]), it makes sense that the estimated improvement in assignment submission rates (compared with no notification whatsoever) in Experiment 2 (+5.7%) was higher than Experiment 1 (+3.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to Experiment 1, which estimated the benefit of automated deadline reminders over instructor announcements, Experiment 2 estimated the cumulative benefit of both types of notifications, comingled in the same pragmatic treatment. Considering that instructor announcements do have benefits for student motivation (e.g., [39]) and behavior (e.g., [40]), it makes sense that the estimated improvement in assignment submission rates (compared with no notification whatsoever) in Experiment 2 (+5.7%) was higher than Experiment 1 (+3.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, even while administrators advocate against views of students as deficient (e.g., [48]), empirical research demonstrates that some paternalistic policies are effective at closing achievement gaps and increasing college preparation in inner-city schools [49,50]. Similarly, an instructor's tailored suggestion of what a student should do can be more effective at improving student engagement than purely informative interventions [40], and instituting a firm schedule of assignment deadlines leads to improved performance over flexible student-selected assignment deadlines [51]. These successful paternalistic approaches share common features of being highly personalized and contextual, and thus difficult to implement at scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatedly, the development of automated intervention techniques remains a fertile ground to sow. Continued research on all sorts of students’ behaviors, such as diligence and time management skills [ 36 , 37 ], and continued research on interventions targeting students’ studying behaviors [ 38 ] will likely allow systems to be created that can train students to optimize their study behaviors, not only through the provision of advice to struggling students, but through training students how they can best study (e.g., through algorithm-driven click behavior guidance).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned previously, we aim to predict student engagement level to be either not engaged, passively engaged or actively engaged. As engagement directly affects the students’ results [ 51 – 53 ], the goal of the proposed prediction system is to evaluate their engagement and motivate them to progress continuously and move up from one category to another; it also helps engaged students to keep the same pace of work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%