Self-Regulation Behaviors of Music Education Students

Abstract

This research aims to examine the self-regulation behaviors of the undergraduate students which they display in their music education process and the differentiation of these behaviors according to various variables as well as collecting the opinions of the students about the musical instrument practice behaviors. In this study, where mixed method was used, data were collected by questionnaire for the survey model and interview techniques for the factual part. For the quantitative part of the study the ‘Self-Regulation Behaviors of Music Students’ scale adapted into Turkish by Ersözlü and Miksza (2015) and was used The themes was acquired by coding the quantitative results obtained in the interviews conducted to discover the behaviors of the students in the instrument playing process. In the study group of the research, the quantitative part consists of 240 students (n=240) studying in music teaching undergraduate programs in Conservatories, Fine Arts, Art Design Faculties and Education Faculties located in different regions of Turkey and the qualitative part consists of (n=5) students. In the results, it was seen that there were significant differences between the 3rd and 4th grades in terms of Behavior dimension of the students. In the Method dimension, on the other hand, there were significant differences between the 1st and 3rd; 3rd and 4th grades in terms of the instrument study year. Furthermore, students have assumed that while they are not able to spare enough time for the study, they recording audios and listening to them again for self-control, evaluating themselves and using personal strategies such as taking notes.

Untitled

“…The quality of the teaching-learning process can be enhanced by some of the advantages they offer (Moran et al, 2011;Tess, 2013) and they allow people to shape the learning process directly or indirectly (Jones et al, 2010). It can be seen that these platforms are preferred in the field of education, especially in prominent topics such as "collaborative learning" (Cayari, 2018;Pettenati and Ranieri, 2006), "informal learning" (Sabaawi and Dahlan, 2017), "microlearning" (Mujica et al, 2021) and "self-regulated learning" (Matzat, & Vrieling, 2016;Turhal, 2022).…”

Interdisciplinary teaching practices in STEAM education in Brazil

“…Notwithstanding the relevance and timeliness in the subject of STEAM education, which has sparked growing interest in research conducted in other countries (Garza and Travis, 2019;Khine and Areepattamannil, 2019;Marín-Marín et al, 2021;Martinez, 2017;Perignat and Katz-Buonincontro, 2019;Tomé, 2021;Turhal, 2020;Lederman et al, 2023), a literature review highlights that efforts for STEM education in South America seem to be in their very early stages in some interdisciplinary programmes (Johnson and Czerniak, 2023) and that the few existing practices in Brazil are aligned to project-based learning, with emphasis on the discipline of science, and are generally implemented in secondary education, in the south-eastern and southern regions of the country (Maia et al, 2021). The results of a systematic literature review show that although teachers value STEM education, they report several challenges of a curricular and pedagogical nature (Margot and Kettler, 2019), as well as concerns related to lack of training.…”

Examining the Relationships between High School Students' Interests in Music and Their Creativity

“…Also, creative work develops and exists in the broader context of its sociocultural environment and especially its recipients (Glãveanu, 2014b). Art education enables the child to perceive and evaluate his environment better (Kaleli, 2020a(Kaleli, , 2020b(Kaleli, , 2021Kara, 2021;Kibici & Sarıkaya, 2021;Turhal, 2022;Yağışan & Sünbül, 2009). Art education provides the first step for creativity by teaching not only to look but also to see, hear and hear (Kara, 2022;Kibici, 2021;Ersoy, 1993).…”