Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1146381.1146405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-stabilizing byzantine agreement

Abstract: Byzantine agreement algorithms typically assume implicit initial state consistency and synchronization among the correct nodes and then operate in coordinated rounds of information exchange to reach agreement based on the input values. The implicit initial assumptions enable correct nodes to infer about the progression of the algorithm at other nodes from their local state. This paper considers a more severe fault model than permanent Byzantine failures, one in which the system can in addition be subject to se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…token circulation, see [9]), as opposed to reaching agreement on the current value of every node, then the agreement algorithm presented can be used to achieve 7 Appendix -The Byz_Agreement Procedure…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…token circulation, see [9]), as opposed to reaching agreement on the current value of every node, then the agreement algorithm presented can be used to achieve 7 Appendix -The Byz_Agreement Procedure…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Byzantine Agreement module extends the approach taken in [9] in using explicit time bounds in order to address the variety of potential problems that may arise when the system is stabilizing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations