2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45414-4_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-stabilizing Minimum Spanning Tree Construction on Message-Passing Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foremost these are algorithms for coloring, spanning trees, independent and dominating sets [5][6][7][8][9]. Furthermore, this work simplifies the design of self-stabilizing for WSNs, developers can work with the central daemon scheduler and do not have to take into considerations the imponderabilities of wireless communication.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Foremost these are algorithms for coloring, spanning trees, independent and dominating sets [5][6][7][8][9]. Furthermore, this work simplifies the design of self-stabilizing for WSNs, developers can work with the central daemon scheduler and do not have to take into considerations the imponderabilities of wireless communication.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-stabilization fits into the unattended operation style of WSNs, where no outside intervention is necessary. Over the last 20 years many self-stabilizing algorithms have been proposed, quite a few of them are of interest for WSNs: graph coloring [5], articulation points [6], dominating sets [7], depth-first trees [8], and spanning trees [9]. However, the majority of these algorithms is based on models not suitable for the constraints of WSNs: shared memory model, central daemon scheduler, unique processor identifiers, and atomicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a sequence of transformations, though, produces a complicated algorithm and incurs time and space overhead (cf. [6,13]). One issue to be overcome in transforming an algorithm for the static message-passing model to the model in our paper is handling the synchrony that is relied upon in some component transformations to message passing (e.g., [14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In asynchronous setting the complexity is Ω(n 2 ) rounds. A different approach for the message-passing model, was proposed by Higham and Liang [11]. The algorithm performs roughly as follows: every edge checks whether it eventually belongs to the MST or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%