1967
DOI: 10.1016/0042-207x(67)93167-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-sticking coefficients of SiO2 films deposited through rf sputtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, re-emission of zinc oxide is well-known with resputtering coefficients for zinc oxide reported to be as high as 0.3 . Under appropriate conditions and geometries, significant quantities of material can be deposited in areas not in line-of-site of the source ,− , and the deposits are reportedly loosely packed , as is the case in the current work. However, re-emission from the surface is not sufficient on its own to explain the ring-shaped deposits of zinc oxide described here because the rings were not formed when the gold under-layer was absent.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, re-emission of zinc oxide is well-known with resputtering coefficients for zinc oxide reported to be as high as 0.3 . Under appropriate conditions and geometries, significant quantities of material can be deposited in areas not in line-of-site of the source ,− , and the deposits are reportedly loosely packed , as is the case in the current work. However, re-emission from the surface is not sufficient on its own to explain the ring-shaped deposits of zinc oxide described here because the rings were not formed when the gold under-layer was absent.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In fact, re-emission of zinc oxide is well-known with re-sputtering coefficients for zinc oxide reported to be as high as 0.3 (25). Under appropriate conditions and geometries, significant quantities of material can be deposited in areas not in line-of-site of the source (24,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) and the deposits are reportedly loosely packed (25), as is the case in the current work.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The most extensive work has been done by James and Carter," who conclude that the predominant mechanism in their system is direct gas sputtering. However, it is known that Si0 2 is resputtered during deposition by rf sputtering, 7 so that in this instance the glass sputtering mechanism for releasing argon may also be important.…”
Section: Theoreticalmentioning
confidence: 99%