2016
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/10421.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Tracking

Abstract: What happens when people turn their everyday experience into data: an introduction to the essential ideas and key challenges of self-tracking. People keep track. In the eighteenth century, Benjamin Franklin kept charts of time spent and virtues lived up to. Today, people use technology to self-track: hours slept, steps taken, calories consumed, medications administered. Ninety million wearable sensors were shipped in 2014 to help us gather data about our lives. This book examines how people reco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
205
0
16

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 416 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
205
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on personal experiences with birth and infants as well as use of OTC monitoring devices, participants pushed back on what Natasha Schull (2016) calls “data for life.” For Schull (, p.319), data for life are “a related, complimentary response to the notion that we are all potentially sick in which wellness depends on the continuous collection, analysis and management of personal data through digital sensor technologies.” Health, no longer simply the state of being free of disease, has become something that must be monitored and cultivated (Dumit ). The availability and use of health tracking digital devices is increasing as more people monitor their mental, emotional and bodily processes (Lupton ,b, Neff and Nafus ). Although the portability and design of smart textiles offer the potential of joining these two markets, participants greatly resisted this move, challenging the wisdom of the further production of anxious parents, an increased workload for clinicians and interventions that had no evidence of positive impact on outcomes.…”
Section: The Contemporary Contours Of Medicalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on personal experiences with birth and infants as well as use of OTC monitoring devices, participants pushed back on what Natasha Schull (2016) calls “data for life.” For Schull (, p.319), data for life are “a related, complimentary response to the notion that we are all potentially sick in which wellness depends on the continuous collection, analysis and management of personal data through digital sensor technologies.” Health, no longer simply the state of being free of disease, has become something that must be monitored and cultivated (Dumit ). The availability and use of health tracking digital devices is increasing as more people monitor their mental, emotional and bodily processes (Lupton ,b, Neff and Nafus ). Although the portability and design of smart textiles offer the potential of joining these two markets, participants greatly resisted this move, challenging the wisdom of the further production of anxious parents, an increased workload for clinicians and interventions that had no evidence of positive impact on outcomes.…”
Section: The Contemporary Contours Of Medicalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of novel electronic tools for collecting standardized, patient-reported outcomes will be invaluable. 82,83 …”
Section: Clinical Registriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walking is of course known to every culture, but only recently has walking become envisioned as an activity to be divided into steps, quantified, and-importantly-recorded by technologies attached to the body. A classically Maussian, nondiscursive technique of the body (see Mauss 1973) has become a discursive technique in its cyborgian manifestation: walking while recording has turned into a topic for discussion, a point of comparison and surveillance of the kind that concerns academic observers (Whitson 2014;Lupton 2016;Nafus 2016;Neff and Nafus 2016). These critical scholars have a point about self-tracking: the frightening possibilities of people reduced to quantifications (heart rates, glucose levels, blood pressure, calories consumed, pounds gained).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I have had colleagues who refuse to go for a walk if they have forgotten their cell phones and ones who have returned home to get their Fitbits so they wouldn't "waste" a day of not counting their steps. Gina Neff and Dawn Nafus (2016) also had interlocutors who reported distress without their Fitbits, as their emotions became imbricated with the technology. "The data," Neff and Nafus (2016,76) argue, "become a 'prosthetic of feeling,' something to help us sense our bodies or the world around us."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation