2010 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/percom.2010.5466993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sell your experiences: a market mechanism based incentive for participatory sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
207
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
207
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, there are conflicting goals between the user and the check-in collector: the former would like to choose large values of L to have strong location privacy, while the latter would prefer small values to retain more check-in data. In order to address this issue, reward mechanisms should be adopted to incentivize personal data sharing, like proposed in recent works (e.g., [14]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there are conflicting goals between the user and the check-in collector: the former would like to choose large values of L to have strong location privacy, while the latter would prefer small values to retain more check-in data. In order to address this issue, reward mechanisms should be adopted to incentivize personal data sharing, like proposed in recent works (e.g., [14]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, numerous game theory approaches [39][40][41] have been proposed for mobile crowdsensing and computing to encourage and reward truthful contributions. These game theory techniques are usually based on auction mechanisms, however slightly complex to apply in a fully distributed and time evolving system.…”
Section: Crowdsensing Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16]) have been proposed in the literature, but not many of them have been applied in real-world crowdsensing applications. Viewed with the lens of SPECTRUM, Table 1 shows how a combination of factors could influence the choice of incentive used in real-world mobile crowdsensing applications.…”
Section: Adoption Of Incentive Mechanisms In Real-world Mobile Crowdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16]) have been proposed to address this problem, many of which are designed to suit the crowdsensing context and specific requirements of the underlying sensing initiative. Despite the proliferation of these technical solutions, Restuccia et al [17] draw attention to the fact that it is yet unclear what is the most appropriate incentive to adopt in motivating users to participate in mobile crowdsensing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%