2011
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-65382011000100007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEM study of Sandersiella chilenica sp.nov. (Cephalocarida), with a review of the Integumentary Structures and Functional Adaptations in the Group

Abstract: Estudio con microscopia de barrido de Sandersiella chilenica n. sp. (Cephalocarida), con una revisión de las Estructuras del Integumento y Adaptaciones Funcionales en el Grupo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2000; Zimmer et al . 2009; Stuardo & Vega 2011; Keiler & Richter 2011). In our scheme the categories A, B, C and D refer to hollow projections (spines and/or setae) that can be broadly characterized as simple, serrate, pappose and plumose, respectively, whereas category E contains unusual blunt‐tipped forms, and category F contains solid setules, denticles and scales arising directly from the cuticle.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2000; Zimmer et al . 2009; Stuardo & Vega 2011; Keiler & Richter 2011). In our scheme the categories A, B, C and D refer to hollow projections (spines and/or setae) that can be broadly characterized as simple, serrate, pappose and plumose, respectively, whereas category E contains unusual blunt‐tipped forms, and category F contains solid setules, denticles and scales arising directly from the cuticle.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in decapods and other crustaceans determined that a comparison of the morphology and distribution of setae in crustaceans is useful in understanding how the animal senses its environment, finds and manipulates its food and grooms itself. Setal morphology can also be valuable in phylogenetic and taxonomic studies (Watling, 1989;Stuardo & Vega, 2011). Furthermore, knowledge of crustacean mouthparts is often used to understand the ecology, evolution and phylogeny of various species (Bruce, 1986;Coelho & Rodrigues, 2001;Karanovic et al, 2011;Geiselbrecht & Melzer, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%