2005
DOI: 10.1163/156853705774648509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic and Perceptual Representations of Color: Evidence of a Shared Color-Naming Function

Abstract: Much research on color representation and categorization has assumed that relations among color terms can be proxies for relations among color percepts. We test this assumption by comparing the mapping of color words with color appearances among different observer groups performing cognitive tasks: (1) an invariance of naming task; and (2) triad similarity judgments of color term and color appearance stimuli within and across color categories. Observer subgroups were defined by perceptual phenotype and photopi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem with this explanation, however, is that it does not agree with patterns of results found in Figure 3 which illustrate how the F-M 100 dissimilarity scaling systematically tracks variation in chromatic banding results found using the Jameson et al (2001) task, nor does it accord with the systematic tendencies in the angular and radial compression parameters shown in Figure 2. Finally, recent independent results by Sayim, Jameson, Alvarado and Szeszel (2005) suggest that female heterozygotes show significant differences in cognitive color processing in ways that accord with the results presented here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The problem with this explanation, however, is that it does not agree with patterns of results found in Figure 3 which illustrate how the F-M 100 dissimilarity scaling systematically tracks variation in chromatic banding results found using the Jameson et al (2001) task, nor does it accord with the systematic tendencies in the angular and radial compression parameters shown in Figure 2. Finally, recent independent results by Sayim, Jameson, Alvarado and Szeszel (2005) suggest that female heterozygotes show significant differences in cognitive color processing in ways that accord with the results presented here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We simulate both normal and deficient observer groups using human data. "Normal" agents include those modeled on normal trichromat FM100 performance data, with trichromacy confirmed by pseudoisochromatic plate assessment [25]. "Deficient" agents are modeled using protanope and deuteranope performances from an FM100 diagnostic database [26].…”
Section: Modeling Different Forms Of Observer Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in previous photopigment opsin genotyping research molecular genetics research has determined that genotypes involving more than three normal photopigment opsin variants are not uncommon, [3,4,12,13,18,25] and it is thought that mechanisms governing expression of such photopigment opsin genes does not rule out the possibility that an individual will express more than three classes of retinal photopigments. The aim of much of the research into potential human tetrachromacy has been to discover (a) how the possession of extra photopigment opsin genes may alter perceptual processing of color, and (b) what the X-chromosome linked features of the L-cone and M-cone opsin genes implies for potential human tetrachromacy and gender-linked color vision processing di↵erences.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%