2008
DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.1.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic contribution to verbal short-term memory: Are pleasant words easier to remember than neutral words in serial recall and serial recognition?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the high working memory demands used in these tasks and the involvement of executive and strategic processes necessary for updating and stimulus manipulation render the interpretation of this null result somewhat difficult. Monnier and Syssau (2008), using a pure list design and simple ISR 8 tasks, observed indeed better recall performance for pleasant (positive) word lists as compared to neutral word lists. Possible differences in semantic relatedness between the two list types were not controlled, however, so the specific mechanisms underlying the detected difference in STM recall remain unclear.…”
Section: The Impact Of Emotional Semantic Content On Stmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the high working memory demands used in these tasks and the involvement of executive and strategic processes necessary for updating and stimulus manipulation render the interpretation of this null result somewhat difficult. Monnier and Syssau (2008), using a pure list design and simple ISR 8 tasks, observed indeed better recall performance for pleasant (positive) word lists as compared to neutral word lists. Possible differences in semantic relatedness between the two list types were not controlled, however, so the specific mechanisms underlying the detected difference in STM recall remain unclear.…”
Section: The Impact Of Emotional Semantic Content On Stmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, increased semantic relatedness is not sufficient to explain the increased LTM support for emotional words observed in this study. Another candidate, increased word imageability, can also be ruled out since this variable was carefully controlled for, as it was in previous studies (Tse & Altarriba, 2009;Talmi & Moscovitch, 2004;Monnier & Syssau, 2008). Then how does the facilitated semantic LTM support for emotional words originate?…”
Section: The Emotional Valence Effect As New Evidence For Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…: Kanske & Kotz, 2007;Kousta, Vinson, & Vigliocco, 2009;Kuchinke, Võ, Hofmann, & Jacobs, 2007;Kuperman, Estes, Brysbaert, & Warriner, 2014;Ortigue et al, 2004;Scott, O'Donnell, Leuthold, & Sereno, 2009;Syssau & Laxén, 2012), they affect recall in short term- (Majerus & D'Argembeau, 2011;Mammarella, Borella, Carretti, Leonardi, & Fairfield, Emotional Norms for Spanish Words 5 2013; Monnier & Syssau, 2008) and long-term memory (Dewhurst & Parry, 2000;Kensinger & Corkin, 2003;Talmi & Moscovitch, 2004), and they modulate attention effects (Mathewson, Arnell, & Mansfield, 2008;Stormark, Nordby, & Hugdahl, 1995). The interest in the effects of emotional properties on language processing goes beyond single-words, with several studies looking into their effect on the morpho-syntactic processing of sentences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the word repetition tests present material having a greater semantic load than that of digits, we would expect a better performance of participants with deficit in the phonoarticulatory loop during word repetition than during digit span tests, such as previously observed 26 . It was compared verbal short-term memory with pleasant and neutral words and concluded that pleasantness have a facilitation effect on both immediate serial recall and immediate serial recognition.…”
Section: Working Memory Testsmentioning
confidence: 90%