2016 Annual IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/syscon.2016.7490579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic design space refinement for model-based systems engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The future work of this study involves the expansion of the case study and extraction of the SoS design space generated in the inferred ontology file. Similar approaches to those presented in [31] can be used to transfer the information from the ontology to matrix-based approaches. This transfer allows for more advanced numerical calculations and optimizations needed for the remaining levels of interest proposed in [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The future work of this study involves the expansion of the case study and extraction of the SoS design space generated in the inferred ontology file. Similar approaches to those presented in [31] can be used to transfer the information from the ontology to matrix-based approaches. This transfer allows for more advanced numerical calculations and optimizations needed for the remaining levels of interest proposed in [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies from Georgia Tech's Aerospace Design Laboratory (ASDL) have shown that ontologies can be used to model and prune the design space of cyberphysical systems in the context of conceptual design [30]. It has also been shown that matrix-based approaches such as an Interactive Reconfigurable Matrix of Alternatives (IRMA) can be used to illustrate and create the available design space from the knowledge captured in the ontology [31].…”
Section: Capability-and System-of-systems Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure to recognize this variability is a common symptom of the MBSE community. MBSE practitioners usually value the identification of a common vocabulary in order to help stakeholders from different domains to collaborate [16]. This way of thinking takes a concrete form in tools and standards that emphasize a central repository of knowledge using a single vocabulary for all considered domains [17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al 10 proposed a new ontology-based semantic representation model for design rational information. Schmit et al 18 introduced an ontological approach for design space refinement in conceptual design for model-based systems engineering. Juan et al 19 defined ontology to capitalize knowledge about case-based reasoning (CBR) processes for systems design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%