2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Differential and its Risks in the Measurement of Students’ Attitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected scales of the semantic differential (Chráska jr. & Chrásková, 2016) were used to calculate the average evaluation and energy values for the concepts associated with stress and healthy lifestyle. Specific values for individual groups of respondents by year of study and gender are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selected scales of the semantic differential (Chráska jr. & Chrásková, 2016) were used to calculate the average evaluation and energy values for the concepts associated with stress and healthy lifestyle. Specific values for individual groups of respondents by year of study and gender are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in an educational context a twofactor semantic differential can be used. However, it is always necessary to test this measurement tool for its factor structure (Chráska jr. & Chrásková, 2016) and select appropriate scales.…”
Section: Ater Two-factor Semantic Differentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semantic differential technique is widely used in Russian and foreign scientific literature to study respondents' perception of stimulus objects of a different nature such as verbal, visual, or polycode [8,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. One should not forget that the semantic differential can be used to study the level of formation and integrity of respondent's ideas about the world (cognitive diagnostics), as well as to study personal attitudes and emotional relationships towards given objects (projective techniques).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This structure can be used as an explanatory model to find out how an individual perceives, classifies, compares, and evaluates given objects or their characteristics [16].The connection of the SD method with the AE method is shown in the works of K. Noble, A. Staats and K. Staats. The scientists proved the presence of a high correlation between the Osgood's pragmatic value and Noble's measure of an associative connectivity of words [17]. The main advantage of this method is its easy administration and relatively fast evaluation.…”
Section: Boysmentioning
confidence: 98%