Semantic matching: Formal ontological distinctions for information organization, extraction, and integration

Abstract

Abstract. The task of information extraction can be seen as a problem of semantic matching between a user-defined template and a piece of information written in natural language. To this purpose, the ontological assumptions of the template need to be suitably specified, and compared with the ontological implications of the text. So-called "ontologies", consisting of theories of various kinds expressing the meaning of shared vocabularies, begin to be used for this task. This paper addresses the theoretical issues related to the design and use of such ontologies for purposes of information retrieval and extraction. After a discussion on the nature of semantic matching within a model-theoretical framework, we introduce the subject of Formal Ontology, showing how the notions of parthood, integrity, identity, and dependence can be of help in understanding, organizing and formalizing fundamental ontological distinctions. We present then some basic principles for ontology design, and we illustrate a preliminary proposal for a top-level ontology develped according to such principles. As a concrete ' example of ontology-based information retrieval, we finally report an ongoing experience of use of a large linguistic ontology for the retrieval of object-oriented software components.

Interação e Autismo: Uso de Agentes Inteligentes para Detectar Déficits de Comunicação em Ambientes Síncronos

“…Há várias definições a respeito do que é uma ontologia, mas Guarino (1997) resume dizendo que uma ontologia é uma conceitualização compartilhada de um determinado domínio. Ela é composta de um conjunto de conceitos dentro desse domínio, sendo esse organizado como uma taxionomia e de relações entre esses conceitos.…”

An Ontology of the Submarine Relief for Analysis and Representation on Nautical Charts

“…Geospatial ontologies can deal with the totality of geospatial concepts, categories, relationships, processes, and with their interrelations at di↵erent resolutions (Mark et al, 2000). Guarino (1997) classified ontologies into four categories (top-level, domain, task and application ontologies) according to their proximity to a specific task or point of view. Conceptualising knowledge for a specific application is done by gathering specific knowledge from a domain and by integrating concepts from higher level ontologies.…”

CI-Miner: semantically enhancing scientific processes

“…The way ontologies are created and used is driven by their purpose of use. In particular, Guarino (1997) suggested the classification of ontologies according to their level of dependence to a particular task or point of view.…”